Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 13;16(4):529. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040529

Table 5.

Maternal Demographic, Employment, Pregnancy, and Breastfeeding Characteristics by Industry.

Characteristic Industry (n = 373) p-Value 1 Sig.2
Accommodation Healthcare Retail Other
(n = 87) (n = 94) (n = 65) (n = 127)
Demographics Age (years) 15 to 17 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.023 *
18 to 34 77.0% (n = 67) 74.5% (n = 70) 84.6% (n = 55) 73.2% (n = 93)
35 and over 6.9% (n = 6) 20.2% (n = 19) 9.2% (n = 6) 17.3% (n = 22)
Not Reported 16.1% (n = 14) 5.3% (n = 5) 6.2% (n = 4) 9.4% (n = 12)
Race/Ethnicity Other 17.2% (n = 15) 10.6% (n = 10) 6.2% (n = 4) 14.2% (n = 18) 0.191
Non-Hispanic White 82.8% (n = 72) 88.3% (n = 83) 93.8% (n = 61) 85.8% (n = 109)
Not Reported 0.0% (n = 0) 1.1% (n = 1) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0)
Employment Status Full time 48.3% (n = 42) 46.8% (n = 44) 33.8% (n = 22) 39.4% (n = 50) 0.017 *
Part time 41.4% (n = 36) 34.0% (n = 32) 60.0% (n = 39) 42.5% (n = 54)
Other 10.3% (n = 9) 19.1% (n = 18) 6.2% (n = 4) 18.1% (n = 23)
Not Reported 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0)
During Pregnancy Hoping to Feed Combination 31.0% (n = 27) 34.0% (n = 32) 30.8% (n = 20) 26.8% (n = 34) 0.029 ^
Breastfeeding only 42.5% (n = 37) 53.2% (n = 50) 49.2% (n = 32) 63.0% (n = 80)
Formula only 24.1% (n = 21) 9.6% (n = 9) 15.4% (n = 10) 7.1% (n = 9)
Not Reported 2.3% (n = 2) 3.2% (n = 3) 4.6% (n = 3) 3.1% (n = 4)
Received Information Yes 90.8% (n = 79) 100.0% (n = 94) 96.9% (n = 63) 94.5% (n = 120) 0.017 *
No 9.2% (n = 8) 0.0% (n = 0) 3.1% (n = 2) 4.7% (n = 6)
Not Reported 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.0% (n = 0) 0.8% (n = 1)
Reason for Stopping Breastfeeding Physiological Yes 63.9% (n = 39) 73.9% (n = 51) 58.3% (n = 28) 60.7% (n = 54) 0.249
No 36.1% (n = 22) 26.1% (n = 18) 41.7% (n = 20) 39.3% (n = 35)
Other Commitments Yes 26.2% (n = 16) 14.5% (n = 10) 12.5% (n = 6) 28.1% (n = 25) 0.059
No 73.8% (n = 45) 85.5% (n = 59) 87.5% (n = 42) 71.9% (n = 64)
Met Goal Yes 6.6% (n = 4) 10.1% (n = 7) 14.6% (n = 7) 16.9% (n = 15) 0.256
No 93.4% (n = 57) 89.9% (n = 62) 85.4% (n = 41) 83.1% (n = 74)

1p-Value was based on Fisher’s exact tests or Fisher’s exact tests with Freeman and Halton’s adaptations for RxC tables. 2 Statistical significance (*) was based on an alpha of 0.05 with Bonferroni correction based on the number of comparisons within each category or domain (with no correction for demographic variables). A Monte Carlo estimation with 10,000,000 samples was used to calculate Fisher–Freeman–Halton statistics for tables with industry. Estimates were considered marginally significant (^) if they met the alpha criteria of 0.05 but were no longer significant after Bonferroni correction.