Abstract
Purpose
To summarize actual literature data on clinical signs, differential diagnosis, and treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis.
Methods
Review of literature.
Results
Clinical signs of acanthamoeba keratitis are in early stages grey-dirty epithelium, pseudodendritiformic epitheliopathy, perineuritis, multifocal stromal infiltrates, ring infiltrate and in later stages scleritis, iris atrophy, anterior synechiae, secondary glaucoma, mature cataract, and chorioretinitis. As conservative treatment, we use up to one year triple-topical therapy (polyhexamethylene-biguanide, propamidine-isethionate, neomycin). In therapy resistant cases, surgical treatment options such as corneal cryotherapy, amniotic membrane transplantation, riboflavin-UVA cross-linking, and penetrating keratoplasty are applied.
Conclusion
With early diagnosis and conservative or surgical treatment, acanthamoeba keratitis heals in most cases.
Keywords: Acanthamoeba, Keratitis, Cornea, Contact lens
Introduction
Acanthamoeba keratitis is a rare but potentially devastating ocular infection, occurring mostly in contact lens wearers. Acanthamoeba are ubiquitous, free-living protozoa, present in air, soil, dust, drinking water, and also sea water. There is a dormant resilient cyst and an infective trophozoite form.
Acanthamoeba keratitis is often misdiagnosed and treated as herpetic, bacterial, or mycotic keratitis, as many signs and symptoms may look similar to other kinds of keratitis. It is challenging for an ophthalmologist to find the right diagnosis1, 2; therefore, diagnosis is often delayed and ophthalmologists tend to observe a heterogeneous and protracted clinical course.
Acanthamoeba physiology and life cycle
Acanthamoeba is present in two forms: trophozoites and cysts.
The so-called vegetative form, or trophozoite, has a size of 25–40 μms, and it feeds on bacteria, algae, and yeasts. Enterobacteria are especially preferred through acanthamoeba but some acanthamoeba species house bacteria as endosymbionts.3
The double-walled cysts have a 13–20 μm size and survive antibiotics, low temperatures (for example 15 months at −15 °C), high doses of UV-light, and γ-radiation. In case of adverse conditions, acanthamoeba trophozoites form cysts which may survive over 24 years.
Acanthamoeba are classified through their rDNA-sequence-types (T1–T12) (Stothard). Acanthamoeba keratitis most often occurs through the T4 genotype.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Acanthamoeba keratitis pathophysiology
In case of a corneal infection, as a first step, acanthamoeba are attached to the corneal epithelial cells through the Mannose-binding Protein. This binding supports secretion of metalloproteinase, serin- and cysteine proteinase through acanthamoeba, which results in cytotoxic effects on human corneal epithelial cells and keratocytes and supports deeper corneal penetration of acanthamoeba.11, 12, 13
Acanthamoeba may also migrate along corneal nerves and damage these.14, 15
Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention
The first reports on acanthamoeba keratitis were published in the seventies.16, 17 With increasing use of contact lenses, its incidence already increased in the 80s,18, 19, 20 and it was 1/30.000 contact lens wearers in the 90s (Great-Britain, Hong Kong).21 Nowadays, about 5% of contact-lens-associated keratitis is caused by acanthamoeba.22, 23
The main risk factors are extended use of contact lenses (therefore, daily lenses have a lower risk),24, 25, 26 use of contact lenses during bath, and cleaning them with tap water.27 Additional risk factors are corneal surface damage, exposition to contaminated water, and low socioeconomic status.28, 29
A study has proven that only hydrogen-peroxide-containing contact lens cleaners are effective against all acanthamoeba strains.30
Acanthamoeba keratitis diagnostics
In the case of clinical signs of acanthamoeba keratitis, diagnostics always have to be performed. We use in vivo confocal microscopy and as in vitro diagnostics, polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), histopathological examination, or microbiological culture.31, 32, 33, 34, 35 All diagnostic methods, including the analyzed material and the sensitivity of the method are summarized at Table 1.
Table 1.
We use in vivo confocal microscopy and as in vitro diagnostics polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR), histopathological examination, or microbiological culture in acanthamoeba keratitis. 2, 31, 32, 33, 34
Diagnostic method | Analyzed material | Sensitivity |
---|---|---|
In-vivo confocal microscopy | In vivo corneal examination | Above 90% with experienced examiner |
Polymerase-chain reaction (PCR) | Corneal scrapings (epithelum) or corneal biopsy + contact lense case and cleaning solution | 84–100% |
In-vitro culture | Corneal scrapings (epithelum) or corneal biopsy + contact lense case and cleaning solution | 0–77% |
Histopathological analysis | Corneal scrapings or excision or explanted tissue from keratoplasty | 31–65% |
As a first step, we recognized clinical signs of acanthamoeba keratitis to use the appropriate diagnostic methods. These are summarized below.
PCR of corneal scrapings has with 84–100% the highest sensitivity and may give a result within 60 min.36, 37, 38, 39 However, PCR may have the disadvantage that also not living acanthamoeba genome may give a positive result.3
In vivo confocal microscopy has more than 90% sensitivity in experienced hands; however, only acanthamoeba cysts are well recognized using this method.33, 34, 35
In vitro culture may have 0–70% sensitivity. This technique uses the fact the acanthamoeba grows well on Escherichia coli (E. coli), and acanthamoeba forms lines in an E. coli-covered plate. This method has the disadvantage of giving results within 3 weeks.40, 41, 42
Presence of acanthamoeba may also be verified through histopathological analysis, with 31–65% sensitivity. Corneal scrapings or excision or explanted tissue from keratoplasty may be analyzed using periodic acid Schiff, Masson, Gram, Giemsa, Grocott-methenamine-silver, or calcofluor-white stainings.36, 43, 44
Clinical symptoms
In early stages of the disease, about 75–90% of all patients are misdiagnosed, as typical acanthamoeba keratitis symptoms are difficult to associate.5, 9 Analysis of the German Acanthamoeba Keratitis Registry have shown that in 47.6% herpetic, in 25.2% mycotic, and in 3.9% bacterial keratitis was erroneously diagnosed by ophthalmologist in acanthamoeba keratitis patients.33 Patients had the correct acanthamoeba keratitis diagnosis not before 2.8 ± 4.0 months (range, 0–23 months) after appearance of the first clinical symptoms, in Germany.33
In about 23% of the cases,2, 31, 44, 45, 46 a mixed infection with virus, bacteria, or fungi is present.
Clinical signs of acanthamoeba keratitis are the following44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 (Table 2):
-
•
Chameleon-like epithelial changes ("dirty epithelium", pseudodendritiformic epitheliopathy, epithelial microerosions, and microcysts) (Fig. 1A)
-
•
Multifocal stromal infiltrates (Fig. 2A)
- •
-
•
Peripheral perineurial infiltrate (Fig. 3)
-
•
Common complications: broad-based anterior synechiae, secondary glaucoma, iris atrophy, mature cataract (Fig. 4), persistent endothelial defect
-
•
Rare complications: sterile anterior uveitis, scleritis (Fig. 4)
-
•
Very rare complications: chorioretinitis and retinal vasculitis
Table 2.
Clinical symptoms and their timely presentation in acanthamoeba keratitis.
Clinical symptom | Time | Special properties |
---|---|---|
Chameleon-like epithelial changes (“dirty epithelium”) (Fig. 1A) | Within the first 2 weeks in 50% of the patients | Grey epithelial opacities, pseudodendritiformic epitheliopathy, epithelial microerosions or microcysts |
Multifocal stromal infiltrates (Fig. 2A) | Within the first 2 weeks | Mostly central and paracentral |
Ringinfiltrate/Wessely immune ring (Fig. 1, Fig. 2A) | In the first month in 20% of the patients | From polymorphonuclear leukocytes, antigen-antibody-komplex and complement; incidence increases with time |
Perineural infiltrate (Fig. 3) | In the first month of the disease in 2.5–63% of the patients | Radial, from limbus to middle stroma, results in loss of corneal nerve fibers |
Sterile anterior uveitis, scleritis, broad-based anterior synechiae, secondary glaucoma, iris atrophie, mature cataract (Fig. 4), chorioretinitis, retinal vasculitis | Late symptoms, following months | Rare Reason unknown (treatment or disease?).56, 57 |
Fig. 1.
"Dirty epithelium" (A), ring infiltrate (arrows) (B), and six months later excimer laser penetrating keratoplasty with interrupted sutures (C), in acanthamoeba keratitis.
Fig. 2.
Incomplete ring infiltrate (arrow) and multifocal stromal infiltrates in acanthamoeba keratitis (A). One week later excimer laser penetrating keratoplasty with interrupted sutures (B).
Fig. 3.
Perineuritis in acanthamoeba keratitis (arrow), 4 weeks after first symptoms (contact lens wearer).
Fig. 4.
Scleritis, corneal ulcer, iris atrophy, persistent mydriasis, and mature cataract in severe acanthamoeba keratitis.
Differential diagnosis
“Dirty epithelium” and pseudodendritiformic epitheliopathy have to be differentiated from an epithelial herpetic keratitis (dendritic or geographic). These do not have round spot-like widenings at the endings of the epithelial erosions, unlike herpetic epithelial keratitis.
In absence of bacterial or mycotic superinfection of an acanthamoeba keratitis, the stromal infiltrates in acanthamoeba keratitis are multifocal, dot-like (like unsharp-edged stromal stars), and in part transparent in an early stage of the disease. In contrast, bacterial or mycotic stromal infiltrates are thicker and typically monofocal. Nevertheless, satellite infiltrates in fungal keratitis may imitate multifocal stromal infiltrates of acanthamoeba keratitis.
The Wessely immune ring may be present in bacterial, mycotic, or acanthamoeba keratitis. The clinical image of the stromal infiltrates at the same time differentiates these clinical entities.
Acanthamoeba keratitis treatment
There are only case series on safety and effectivity of medical and surgical treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis, and there are no randomized, controlled, clinical studies to date.
Conservative treatment
Diamidine and biguanide
Diamidines, such as propamidine-isethionate (Brolene), hexamidine-diisethionate (Hexacyl), and dibromopropamidine (Golden Eye) are used in 0.1% concentration.58, 59, 60 Biguanides, such as polyhexamethylene-biguanide (polyhexanid) (Lavasept), and chlorhexidine (Curasept) are applied in 0.02% concentration.2
The concentration dependent effect of diamidines and biguanides on human epithelial cells, keratocytes, and endothelial cells have already been described, and propamidine-isethionate as diamidine and chlorhexidine as biguanide seem to be the least cytotoxic. However, these may reduce proliferation and migration of human corneal cells more than other diamidines and biguanides.61
Antibiotics
Neomycin kills trophozoites, prevents bacterial superinfection,62 and reduces bacterial load, as a food source for acanthamoeba.2
Povidone-iodine and miltefosine
An in vitro experiment reported on a better anticystic effect of 1% povidone-iodine as propamidine-isethionate or polyhexanide. However, clinical studies did not verify these results.63
Miltefosine was effective against acanthamoeba in vitro.64
Steroids
Topical use of steroids may mask clinical signs of acanthamoeba keratitis as long as these are used. Their disadvantage is that they support encystment and an increase in number of trophozoites. However, a patient with acanthamoeba keratitis and severe inflammation may also benefit from their use. Steroids should never be used without additional topical antiseptics and should never be applied at early stages of acanthamoeba keratitis treatment (never in the first week even after appropriate diagnosis).65, 66 In the case of stopping topical steroids, a Wessely immune ring may develop within 2 days in patients with acanthamoeba keratitis.
Antifungals
Miconazole and clotrimazole have been previously used as topical treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis.67, 68 In addition, there are reports on local and systemic voriconazole use in these patients.67, 68, 69 An in vitro study described better anticystic effects using natamycin in contrast to propamidine-isethionate or polyhexamethylene-biguanide.63 However, data on clinical use of natamycin in acanthamoeba keratitis patients is not available.
In Germany, we suggest topical application of polyhexamethylene-biguanide, propamidine-isethionate, and neomycin as triple-therapy in case of acanthamoeba keratitis.2 To date, there is no randomized controlled clinical trial on safety and efficacy of conservative treatment in acanthamoeba keratitis.
During the first two days a “surprise attack” or “flash war” is initiated with polyhexamethylene-biguanide and propamidine-isethionate every quarter to half and hour day and night. Then until the sixth day, polyhexamethylene-biguanide and propamidine-isethionate are applied every hour and only over the day (6:00–24:00). The following 4 weeks, eyedrop use is reduced to every 2 h. Additionally, neomycin 5× a day is also applied.62 In therapy resistant cases, we may change polyhexamethylene-biguanide to chlorhexidine, or increase concentration (for polyhexamethyleny-biguanidy to 0.06%, for chlorhexidine to 0.2%).
To the best of our actual knowledge, combination therapy using diamidine, biguanide, and antibiotics should be continued in descending doses for 1 year. However, in case of non-healing epithelial defects after penetrating keratoplasty, we may reduce use of diamidine and biguanide with 1 drop every two months.
Surgical treatment
Through diagnostic and therapeutic epithelial abrasion, we remove microorganisms and get a better penetration of topical medication.70 If topical conservative treatment does not improve clinical signs and symptoms, a corneal cryotherapy, amniotic membrane transplantation, or penetrating keratoplasty may be performed. In therapy resistant cases, a cross-linking treatment as photodynamic therapy maybe used, in some cases repeatedly.
Corneal cryotherapy is an adjuvant treatment of topical therapy. The infected corneal areas or the recipient area before penetrating keratoplasty will be treated using a Cold Cryoprobe 2–3 times (“freeze-thaw-freeze") until ice crystals are formed in the corneal stroma.71 As part of a penetrating keratoplasty, cryotherapy is circularly used (about 2 s at −80 °C to the recipient bed) before recipient trephination. The effect of this type of cryotherapy on limbal epithelial stem cells has not been clarified to date.
An amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) may be used, especially for persistent epithelial defects or ulcers as “Patch”, “Graft”, or “Sandwich” and may help reach a quiet stage of the eye.72 In many cases, AMT has to be repeated several times to reach epithelial closure.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) may be an alternative treatment option in therapy resistant infectious keratitis.73 The successful use of riboflavin-UVA cross-linking in acanthamoeba keratitis has been summarized in a case series in 2011.74 Nevertheless, in case of stromal infiltrates, UVA-light penetration to the corneal stroma may be reduced. An accelerated cross-linking in acanthamoeba keratitis is not suggested.
In the case of acanthamoeba keratitis expansion in direction of the corneoscleral limbus, an early penetrating keratoplasty has to be done in order to perform the excision in uninfected corneal tissue. In the case of progressive, therapy-resistant ulceration over weeks and months with peripheral reparative neovascularization, we suggest an early (<5 months disease course) à chaud penetrating keratoplasty75 (Fig. 1, Fig. 2B). The origin of frequent therapy-resistant epithelial defects at the transplanted tissue after penetrating keratoplasty has not been clarified yet. Potential treatment options of these epithelial defects are (1) autologous serum, (2) AMT, (3) Cacicol or, (4) Neurotrophic Growth Factor (NGF).
Following penetrating keratoplasty, we continue the use of the above-described topical treatment up to 1 year.2, 76 However, there are also no controlled clinical trials related to this topic. Perhaps local therapy may be stopped earlier, in order to avoid persistent epithelial defects, peripheral anterior synechiae, and mature cataract. Confocal microscopy may be useful in diagnosis of acanthamoeba keratitis recurrences.32
In the case of perforated corneal ulcers, a non-mechanical, excimer laser keratoplasty is best performed.77 Using an elliptical excimer laser trephination with metal masks, we may remove the infected corneal area with a more homogeneous distance from the limbal vessels, especially in typically elliptical-shaped acanthamoeba keratitis.78
Some authors suggest at least a 3 month long observation period without inflammatory signs, following discontinuation of conservative therapy, before planning an elective penetrating keratoplasty, following acanthamoeba keratitis. In such elective penetrating keratoplasties, transplantate survival may be 100% after 5 years and 67% after 10 years.75, 79
In summary, acanthamoeba keratitis presents in early stages with grey-dirty epithelium, pseudodendritiformic epitheliopathy, perineuritis, multifocal stromal infiltrates, ring infiltrates, and in later stages with scleritis, iris atrophy, anterior synechiae, secondary glaucoma, mature cataract, and chorioretinitis. As conservative treatment, we use up to one year triple-topical therapy (polyhexamethylene-biguanide, propamidine-isethionate, neomycin). In therapy resistant cases, surgical treatment options such as corneal cryotherapy, amniotic membrane transplantation, riboflavin-UVA cross-linking, and penetrating keratoplasty may be applied.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: None.
Peer review under responsibility of the Iranian Society of Ophthalmology.
References
- 1.Meltendorf C., Duncker G. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2011;228(3):R29–R43. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1270800. [Article in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Szentmáry N., Göbels S., Matoula P., Schirra F., Seitz B. Acanthamoeba keratitis – a rare and often late diagnosed disease. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229(5):521–528. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299539. [Article in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weekers P.H., Bodelier P.L., Wijen J.P., Vogels G.D. Effects of grazing by the free-living soil amobae Acanthamoeba castallani, Acanthamoeba polyphaga, and Hartmannella vermiformis on various bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59(7):2317–2319. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.7.2317-2319.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gupta S., Das S.R. Stock cultures of free-living amebas: effct of temperature on viability and pathogenicity. J Parasitol. 1999;85(1):137–139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.De Jonckheere J., van de Voorde H. Differences in destruction of cysts of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Naegleria and Acanthamoeba by chlorine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976;31(2):294–297. doi: 10.1128/aem.31.2.294-297.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khunkitti W., Lloyd D., Furr J.R., Russell A.D. Acanthamoeba castellani: growth, encystment, excystment and biocide susceptibility. J Infect Dis. 1998;36(1):43–48. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(98)93054-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brown T.J., Cursons R.T. Pathogenic free-living amebae (PFLA) from frozen swimming areas in Oslo, Norway. Scand J Infect Dis. 1977;9(3):237–240. doi: 10.3109/inf.1977.9.issue-3.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aksozek A., McClellan K., Howard K., Niederkorn J.Y., Alizadeh H. Resistance of Acanthamoeba castellanii cysts to physical, chemical, and radiological conditions. J Parasitol. 2002;88(3):621–623. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0621:ROACCT]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mazur T., Hadas E., Iwanicka I. The duration oft he cyst stage and the viability and virulence of Acanthamoeba isolates. Trop Med Parasitol. 1995;46(2):106–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stothard D.R., Hay J., chroeder-Deidrich J.M., Seal D.V., Byers T.J. Fluorescent oligonucleotide probes for clinical and environmental detection of Acanthamoeba and the T4 18S rRNA gebe sequence type. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(8):2687–2693. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.8.2687-2693.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Panjwani N. Pathogenesis of acanthamoeba keratitis. Ocul Surf. 2010;8(2):70–79. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70071-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clarke D.W., Niederkorn J.Y. The pathophysiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22(4):175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hadas E., Mazur T. Proteolytic enzymes of pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of Acanthamoeba spp. Trop Med Parasitol. 1993;44(3):197–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Moore M.B., McCulley J.P., Kaufman H.E., Robin J.B. Radial keratoneuritis as a presenting sign in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1986;93(10):1310–1315. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33572-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alfawaz A. Radial keratoneuritis as a presenting sign in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2011;18(3):252–255. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.84062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Naginton J., Watson P.G., Payfair T.J., McGill J., Jones B.R., Steele A.D. Amoebic infection of the eye. Lancet. 1974;2(7896):1537–1540. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)90285-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jones D.B., Visvesvara G.S., Robinson N.M. Acanthamoeba polyphaga keratitis and Acanthamoeba uveitis associated with fatal meningoencephalitis. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1975;95(2):221–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ku J.Y., Chan F.M., Beckingsale P. Acanthamoeba keratitis cluster: and increase in Acanthamoeba keratitis in Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(2):181–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01910.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moore M.B., McCulley J.P., Newton C. Acanthamoeba keratitis. A growing problem in soft and hard contact lens wearers. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(12):1654–1661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schaumberg D.A., Snow K.K., Dana M.R. The epidemic of Acanthamoeba keratitis: where do we stand? Cornea. 1998;17(1):3–10. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199801000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Seal D.V. Acanthamoeba keratitis update – incidence, molecular epidemiology and new drugs for treatment. Eye (Lond) 2003;17(8):893–905. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Butler T.K., Males J.J., Robinson L.P. Six-year review of acanthamoeba keratitis in new south wales, Australia: 1997–2002. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;33(1):41–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Acharya N.R., Lietman T.M., Margolis T.P. Parasites on the rise: a new epidemic of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(2):292–293. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McAllum P., Bahar I., Kaiserman I., Srinivasan S., Slomovic A., Rootman D. Temporal and seasonal trends in Acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 2009;28(1):7–10. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318181a863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Radford C.F., Lehmann O.J., Dart J.K. National acanthamoeba keratitis study group. Acanthamoeba keratitis: multicentre survey in England 1992–1996. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(12):1387–1392. doi: 10.1136/bjo.82.12.1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chew H.F., Yildiz E.H., Hammersmith K.M. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 2011;30(4):435–441. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181ec905f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hammersmith K.M. Diagnosis and management of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(4):327–331. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000233949.56229.7d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stehr-Green J.K., Bailey T.M., Visvesvara G.S. The epidemiology of Acanthamoeba keratitis in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107(4):331–336. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(89)90654-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sharma S., Garg P., Rao G.N. Patient characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of non-contact lens related Acanthamoeba keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84(10):1103–1108. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.10.1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Johnston S.P., Sriram R., Qvarnstrom Y. Resistance of Acanthamoeba cysts to disinfection in multiple contact lens solutions. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(7):2040–2045. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00575-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dart J.K., Saw V.P., Kilvington S. Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis and treatment update 2009. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(4):487–499. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Daas L., Viestenz A., Schnabel P. Confocal microscopy in acanthamoeba keratitis as an early relapse-marker. Clin Anat. 2018;31(1):60–63. doi: 10.1002/ca.22925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Daas L., Szentmáry N., Eppig T. The German acanthamoeba keratitis register: initial results of a multicenter study. Ophthalmologe. 2015;112(9):752–763. doi: 10.1007/s00347-014-3225-7. [Article in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pfister D.R., Cameron J.D., Krachmer J.H., Holland E.J. Confocal microscopy findings of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(2):119–128. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70576-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Duguid I.G., Dart J.K., Morlet N. Outcome of acanthamoeba keratitis treated with polyhexamethyl biguanide and propamidine. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(10):1587–1592. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30092-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lehmann O.J., Green S.M., Morlet N. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of corneal epithelial and tear samples in the diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39(7):1261–1265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qvarnstrom Y., Visvesvara G.S., Sriram R., da Silva A.J. Multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris, and Naegleria fowleri. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(10):3589–3595. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00875-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thompson P.P., Kowalski R.P., Shanks R.M., Gordon Y.J. Validation of real-time PCR for laboratory diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(10):3232–3236. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00908-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mathers W.D., Sutphin J.E., Folberg R., Meier P.A., Wenzel R.P., Elgin R.G. Outbreak of keratitis presumed to be caused by Acanthamoeba. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121(2):129–142. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70577-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Reinhard T., Behrens-Baumann W. Anti-infective drug therapy in ophthalmology – part 4: acanthamoeba keratitis. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2006;223(6):485–491. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-859014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aspöck H. Grundzüge der Diagnostik. In: Hiepe T., Lucius R., Gottstein B., editors. Allgemeine Parasitologie mit den Grundzügen der Immunologie, Diagnostik und Bekämpfung. Parey in MVS Medizinverlage; Stuttgart: 2006. pp. 339–457. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bacon A.S., Frazer D.G., Dart J.K., Matheson M., Ficker L.A., Wright P. A review of 72 consecutive cases of Acanthamoeba keratitis, 1984–1992. Eye (Lond) 1993;7(Pt. 6):719–725. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sharma S., Athmanathan S., Atha-Ur-Rasheed M., Garg P., Rao G.N. Evaluation of immunoperoxidase staining technique in the diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2001;49(3):181–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Claerhout I., Goegebuer A., Van Den Broecke C., Kestelyn P. Delay in diagnosis and outcome of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(8):648–653. doi: 10.1007/s00417-003-0805-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Awwad S.T., Petroll W.M., McCulley J.P., Cavanagh H.D. Updates in acanthamoeba keratitis. Eye Contact Lens. 2007;33(1):1–8. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31802b64c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Perry H.D., Donnenfeld E.D., Foulks G.N., Moadel K., Kanellopoulos A.J. Decreased corneal sensation as an initial feature of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1995;102(10):1565–1568. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30830-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Patel D.V., McGhee C.N. Acanthamoeba keratitis: a comprehensive photographic reference of common and uncommon signs. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37(2):232–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01913.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Papathanassiou M., Gartry D. Steril corneal ulcer with ring infiltrate and hypopyon after recurrent erosions. Eye. 2007;21(1):124–126. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Thomas K.E., Purcell T.L., Tanzer D.J., Schanzlin D.J. Delayed diagnosis of microsporidial stromal keratitis: unusual Wessely ring presentation and partial treatment with medications against Acanthamoeba. BMJ Case Rep. 2011 Feb 24;2011 doi: 10.1136/bcr.08.2010.3233. bcr0820103233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kremer I., Cohen E.J., Eagle R.C., Jr., Udell I., Laibson P.R. Histopathologic evaluation of stromal inflammation in Acanthamoeba keratitis. CLAO J. 1994;20(1):45–48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Clarke D.W., Alizadeh H., Niederkorn J.Y. Failure of Acanthamoeba castellanii to produce intraocular infections. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(7):2472–2478. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Shigeyasu C., Shimazaki J. Ocular surface reconstruction after exposure to high concentrations of antiseptic solutions. Cornea. 2012;31(1):59–65. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318218237e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Awwad S.T., Heilman M., Hogan R.N. Severe reactive ischemic posterior segment inflammation in acanthamoeba keratitis: a new potentially blinding syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):313–320. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Herz N.L., Matoba A.Y., Wilhelmus K.R. Rapidly progressive cataract and iris atrophy during treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(5):866–869. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kelley P.S., Dossey A.P., Patel D., Whitson J.T., Hogan R.N., Cavanagh H.D. Secondary glaucoma associated with advanced acanthamoeba keratitis. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32(4):178–182. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000189039.68782.fe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ehlers N., Hjordtal J. Are cataract and iris atrophy toxic complications of medical treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis? Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004;82(2):228–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2004.00237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Iovieno A., Gore D.M., Carnt N., Dart J.K. Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis: epidemiology, clinical features and treatment outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2340–2347. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Larkin D.F., Kilvington S., Dart J.K. Treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis with polyhexamethylene biguanide. Ophthalmology. 1992;99(2):185–191. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31994-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ficker L., Seal D., Warhurst D., Wright P. Acanthamoeba keratitis – resistance to medical therapy. Eye (Lond) 1990;4(Pt. 6):835–838. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wright P., Warhurst D., Jones B.R. Acanthamoeba keratitis successfully treated medically. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69(10):778–782. doi: 10.1136/bjo.69.10.778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shi L., Stachon T., Seitz B., Wagenpfeil S., Langenbucher A., Szentmáry N. The effect of antiamoebic agents on viability, proliferation and migration of human epithelial cells, keratocytes and endothelial cells, in vitro. Curr Eye Res. 2018;43(6):725–733. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1447674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Elder M.J., Kilvington S., Dart J.K. A clinicopathologic study of in vitro sensitivity testing and Acanthamoeba keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(3):1059–1064. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sunada A., Kimura K., Nishi K. In vitro evaluations of topical agents to treat acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(10):2059–2065. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Polat Z.A., Walochnik J., Obwaller A., Vural A., Dursun A., Arici M.K. Miltefosine and polyhexamethylene biguanide: a new drug combination for the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;42(2):151–158. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.McClellan K., Howard K., Niederkorn J.Y., Alizadeh H. Effect of steroids on Acanthamoeba cysts and trophozoites. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(12):2885–2893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Carnt N., Optom B., Robaei D., Minassian D.C., Dart J.K. The impact of topical corticosteroids used in conjunction with antiamoebic therapy on the outcome of acanthamoeba keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):984–990. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.D`Aversa G., Stern G.A., Driebe W.T., Jr. Diagnosis and successful medical treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(9):1120–1123. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100090046021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Amoils S.P., Heney C. Acanthamoeba keratitis with live isolates treated with cryosurgery and fluconazole. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;127(6):718–720. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00426-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Oldenburg C.E., Acharya N.R., Tu E.Z. Practice patterns and opinions in the treatment of acanthamoeba keratitis. Cornea. 2011;30(12):1363–1368. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31820f7763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Brooks J.G., Jr., Coster D.J., Badenoch P.R. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Resolution after epithelial debridement. Cornea. 1994;13(2):186–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Klüppel M., Reinhard T., Sundmacher R., Daicker B. Therapy of advanced amoeba keratitis with keratoplasty à chaud and adjuvant cryotherapy. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94(2):99–103. doi: 10.1007/s003470050088. [Article in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Seitz B., Resch M.D., Schlötzer-Schrehardt U., Hofmann-Rummelt C., Sauer R., Kruse F.E. Histopathology and ultrastructure of human corneas after amniotic membrane transplantation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(10):1487–1490. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.10.1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Szentmáry N., Goebels S., Bischoff M., Seitz B. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) for infectious keratitis. Ophthalmologe. 2012;109(2):165–170. doi: 10.1007/s00347-011-2511-x. [Article in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Khan Y.A., Kashiwabuchi R.T., Martins S.A. Riboflavin and ultraviolet light a therapy as an adjuvant treatment for medically refractive Acanthamoeben keratitis: report of 3 cases. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(2):324–331. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Laurik K.L., Szentmáry N., Daas L. 2016. Penetrating keratoplasty à chaud in acute acanthamoeba keratitis. [ARVO abstract] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hager T., Hasenfus A., Stachon T., Seitz B., Szentmáry N. Crosslinking and corneal cryotherapy in acanthamoeba keratitis – a histological study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(1):149–153. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3189-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Seitz B., Langenbucher A., Kus M.M., Küchle M., Naumann G.O. Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(6):1556–1564. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90265-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Szentmáry N., Langenbucher A., Kus M.M., Naumann G.O., Seitz B. Elliptical nonmechanical corneal trephination - intraoperative complications and long-term outcome of 42 consecutive penetrating keratoplasties. Cornea. 2007;26(4):414–420. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3180303b16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Robaei D., Carnt N., Minassian D.C., Dart J.K. Therapeutic and optical keratoplasty in the management of Acanthamoeba keratitis: risk factors, outcomes, and summary of the literature. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]