Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;39(10):1842–1854. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3477-17.2018

Table 3.

rGT and cued rGT performance at baseline for Experiment 2a

Behavioral measure rGT Cued rGT Optimal Risk-preferring
P1 7.61 ± 2.10 9.76 ± 2.91 10.42 ± 3.29 6.95 ± 1.39
P2 62.72 ± 9.34 23.91 ± 5.04 66.33 ± 9.69 20.30 ± 3.69
P3 13.81 ± 3.29 39.09 ± 7.43 8.10 ± 2.22 44.79 ± 7.45
P4 15.86 ± 3.22 27.24 ± 5.48 15.14 ± 3.03 27.95 ± 5.57
Score 40.67 ± 9.30 −32.66 ± 9.15 53.50 ± 8.61 −45.49 ± 7.78
Premature Responses 12.09 ± 1.99 22.40 ± 3.31 14.85 ± 2.45 19.64 ± 3.10
Trials completed 89.80 ± 12.39 64.44 ± 8.69 93.99 ± 12.76 60.25 ± 7.89
Omitted responses 3.21 ± 0.66 1.21 ± 0.34 2.48 ± 0.52 1.94 ± 0.56
Choice latency 1.64 ± 0.23 1.29 ± 0.19 1.44 ± 0.21 1.49 ± 0.22
Collect latency 0.94 ± 0.13 0.61 ± 0.09 0.90 ± 0.12 0.65 ± 0.09

aData are mean ± SEM.