Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;9:45. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00045

Table 1.

Results of the oral vaccination on cattle tick infestations.

Group (cattle no.) No. female ticks Female tick weight (mg) Oviposition egg mass/tick (mg) Fertility (No. larvae/tick)
SUB+IV (1) 36 233 ± 92 98 ± 61 592 ± 490
SUB+IV (3) 59 210 ± 68 116 ± 37 961 ± 620
SUB+IV (5) 73 234 ± 47 104 ± 38 819 ± 610
Average ± S.D. 56 ± 19* 226 ± 14 106 ± 9 791 ± 186**
Control IV (2) 113 206 ± 53 114 ± 40 1, 118 ± 571
Control IV (4) 116 207 ± 54 114 ± 39 1, 157 ± 558
Average ± S.D. 115 ± 2 207 ± 1 114 ± 0 1, 138 ± 28

Results are shown for each vaccinated and infested cattle (N = 3 for SUB+IV and N = 2 for IV). Data was analyzed statistically to compare results between ticks fed on SUB+IV and IV vaccinated cattle (

*

p = 0.02

**

p = 0.04; Student's t-test with unequal variance). Vaccine efficacy (E = 65%) was calculated as E = 100 x [1-(DT x DF)], where DT = No. female ticks in SUB+IV vaccinated calves/female ticks in IV vaccinated calves and DF = No. larvae/tick in SUB+IV vaccinated calves/No. larvae/tick in IV vaccinated calves.