Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;7:e6565. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6565

Figure 4. Effects of baicalin pretreatment following H2O2 stimulation on ROS production in bovine MEC.

Figure 4

BMECs were cultured for 24 h in medium without (control) or with different concentrations of H2O2 at increasing doses (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 µM) in triplicate. Data shown as mean ± S.E. (A) BMECs were plated in 96 well plates at a density of 5,000/well. MTT (25 μl of five mg/mL) was added to check the cell viability assay (Optical density, OD). *p < 0.05 versus control (B) The ROS production was determined by a fluorimetric assay. Data are expressed in percentage of the control. *p < 0.05 versus control (C) and (D) BMECs were pretreated with different concentrations of baicalin (BC, 0–200 µg/mL). After 24 h, they were exposed to different concentrations of H2O2 (0, 25, 50, 100 µM) in triplicate (C) or to 100 µM in triplicate (D). The ROS production (C) was determined by a fluorimetric assay. Data are expressed in arbitrary unit (OD ×1000). *p < 0.05 versus control. Cell viability assay was also assessed (D). Results without Baicalin and with 100 µM H2O2 represent 100% viability. *p < 0.05 versus control.