Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;11:207–216. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S178003

Table 3.

Adjusted ORs (with accompanying 95% CIs) for the choice of treatment-intensity (non-salvage vs no/palliative and salvage vs non-salvage) for the total cohort, and the subgroup of 610 patients with relapsed disease in the LYFO database in Denmark, 2000–2015

Variables Total cohort (n= 1,228)
Patients with relapse (n= 610)
Non-salvage vs no/palliative
Salvage vs non-salvage
Non-salvage vs no/palliative
Salvage vs non-salvage
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value

Cohabitation status
 Single 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Couple 1.04 (0.7–1.6) 0.8 2.20 (1.3–3.7) 0.003 1.15 (0.7–1.9) 0.5 2.25 (1.2–4.4 0.02

Educational level
 Short 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Medium 0.78 (0.5–1.2) 0.3 1.34 (0.8–2.4) 0.3 0.83 (0.5–1.44) 0.5 1.46 (0.7–3.0) 0.3
 Long 1.12 (0.6–2.0) 0.7 1.54 (0.8–3.1) 0.2 1.46 (0.7–2.9) 0.3 1.33 (0.6–3.1) 0.5
 Unknown 0.26 (0.1–0.6) 0.002 2.14 (0.6–7,7) 0.2 0.30 (0.1–0.7) 0.01 1.37 (0.3–6.5) 0.7

Disposable income
low 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Medium 0.84 (0.5–1.4) 0.5 1.91 (1.1–3.6) 0.05 1.00 (0.5–1.8) 0.9 2.2 (0.9–5.1) 0.06
 High 0.95 (0.6–1.6) 0.9 1.89 (1.0–3.7) 0.06 1.07 (0.6–2.0) 0.8 1.9 (0.8–4.6) 0.1

Comorbidities
 0 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 1 0.75 (0.5–1.2) 0.2 0.85 (0.5–1.5) 0.6 0.61 (0.3–1.1) 0.1 0.88 (0.4–1.8) 0.7
 ≥2 0.60 (0.4–0.9) 0.03 0.52 (0.3–0.9) 0.04 0.49 (0.3–0.8) 0.02 0.34 (0.2–0.8)* 0.01

Notes: All analyses are adjusted for sex, age, and period. Cohabitation: Also adjusted for educational level. Disposable income: Also adjusted for educational level, cohabitation and the number of comorbidities Comorbidities: Also adjusted for educational level.