Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2018 Nov 14;654:1048–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.190

Table 1:

Associations between sociodemographic and lifestyle confounders and peri-pubertal DMFT scores among 386 Mexico City adolescents.

Table 1: Original to this manuscript.

Sociodemographic Characteristics N % of D1MFT >0 D1MFT: Mean (±SD) % of D4MFT>0 D4MFT: Mean (±SD)
386
Child’s Sex
Male 186 74.73 4.71±4.47 35.48 1.05±1.92
Female 200 79.50 5.34±4.40 46.00 1.28±1.84
P value1 0.27 0.16 0.04 0.37
Enrollment Cohort
2 (1997–2000) 144 79.86 6.07±4.55 52.08 1.71±2.34
3 (2001–2005) 242 75.62 4.42±4.26 34.30 0.85±1.46
P value 0.34 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Mother’s Education (y)
Did not complete secondary (<9) 48 77.08 6.00±4.87 35.42 1.04±1.80
Completed some high school (9 to <12) 156 79.49 5.05±4.28 48.08 1.28±1.97
Completed high school (12) 129 75.97 4.91±4.54 37.21 0.99±1.67
Higher education (>12) 53 73.58 4.43±4.21 33.96 1.38±2.16
P trend2 0.46 0.10 0.26 0.87
Peri-pubertal Sugar Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Intake: Mean (ml)
1stQuartile: 141.52 46 72.63 4.89±4.60 44.21 1.25±1.77
2nd Quartile: 399.74 59 82.69 5.18±4.13 40.38 1.35±2.21
3rd Quartile: 663.00 48 78.72 5.38±4.87 45.74 1.17±1.70
4th Quartile: 1097.33 50 74.19 4.67±4.17 33.33 0.88±1.76
P trend 0.98 0.81 0.23 0.13
1:

P value from 2-sample t test.

2:

P value from linear regression analysis.