Table 2a.
All | Traditional neighbourhoods |
Early conventional suburban neighbourhoods |
Late conventional suburban neighbourhoods |
Difference (p-value) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recreational-walking frequency (# days/week) |
2.77 (2.26) | 2.45 (2.08) | 2.87 (2.29) | 2.79 (2.34) | 0.400 |
Destination-walking frequency (# days/week) |
1.63 (2.43) | 1.71 (2.26) | 1.63 (2.46) | 1.56 (2.52) | 0.931 |
Destination walking (1= yes; 0 = no) |
0.40 (0.49) | 0.53 (0.50) | 0.38 (0.49) | 0.33 (0.47) | 0.041* |
Number of respondents | 289 | 62 | 165 | 62 |
Notes:
The number refers to the mean of each variable in its corresponding neighbourhood. Standard errors are in parentheses. The difference refers to whether each variable is statistically significant across the three types of neighbourhoods, byusing the one-way ANOVA.
p≤0.05;
p≤0.01;
p≤0.001.