Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Indoor Built Environ. 2017 Mar 1;27(7):938–952. doi: 10.1177/1420326X17695858

Table 2a.

Descriptive statistics of walking behaviours

All Traditional
neighbourhoods
Early conventional
suburban
neighbourhoods
Late conventional
suburban
neighbourhoods
Difference
(p-value)

Recreational-walking frequency
(# days/week)
2.77 (2.26) 2.45 (2.08) 2.87 (2.29) 2.79 (2.34) 0.400
Destination-walking frequency
(# days/week)
1.63 (2.43) 1.71 (2.26) 1.63 (2.46) 1.56 (2.52) 0.931
Destination walking
(1= yes; 0 = no)
0.40 (0.49) 0.53 (0.50) 0.38 (0.49) 0.33 (0.47) 0.041*
Number of respondents 289 62 165 62

Notes:

The number refers to the mean of each variable in its corresponding neighbourhood. Standard errors are in parentheses. The difference refers to whether each variable is statistically significant across the three types of neighbourhoods, byusing the one-way ANOVA.

*

p≤0.05;

**

p≤0.01;

***

p≤0.001.