Table 3.
All | Traditional neighbourhoods |
Early conventional suburban neighbourhoods |
Late conventional suburban neighbourhoods |
Difference (p-value) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility | 1.70 (0.89) | 2.81 (0.81) | 1.39 (0.64) | 1.41 (0.66) | <0.001*** |
Convenient access to a store | |||||
Convenient access to a park or a playground | |||||
Good access to public transportation | |||||
Enough park or recreational space in or near the neighbourhood | |||||
Traffic safety | 2.70 (0.80) | 2.47 (0.59) | 2.38 (0.54) | 3.77 (0.63) | <0.001*** |
Low amounts of vehicle traffic | |||||
Enough sidewalks | |||||
Well-maintained sidewalks | |||||
Well lighted at night | |||||
Not many street intersections | |||||
Aesthetics | 3.23 (0.58) | 3.48 (0.50) | 3.09 (0.53) | 3.34 (0.70) | <0.001*** |
Well-maintained properties | |||||
Many large and mature trees | |||||
Natural features such as lakes, ponds, forests | |||||
A variety of architectural styles | |||||
Interesting things to see | |||||
Social environment | 3.76 (0.63) | 3.32 (0.59) | 3.86 (0.54) | 3.96 (0.68) | <0.001*** |
Little or no crime | |||||
Physically active neighbours | |||||
Frequent interaction with neighbours | |||||
Many people walking around | |||||
Number of respondents | 289 | 62 | 165 | 62 |
Notes:
The number refers to the mean of each variable in its corresponding neighbourhood. Standard errors are in parentheses. The difference refers to whether each variable is statistically significant across the three types of neighbourhoods, using the one-way ANOVA.
p≤0.05;
p≤0.01;
p≤0.001.