Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Indoor Built Environ. 2017 Mar 1;27(7):938–952. doi: 10.1177/1420326X17695858

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics for perceived neighbourhood characteristics

All Traditional
neighbourhoods
Early
conventional
suburban
neighbourhoods
Late conventional
suburban
neighbourhoods
Difference
(p-value)

Accessibility 1.70 (0.89) 2.81 (0.81) 1.39 (0.64) 1.41 (0.66) <0.001***
 Convenient access to a store
 Convenient access to a park or a playground
 Good access to public transportation
 Enough park or recreational space in or near the neighbourhood
Traffic safety 2.70 (0.80) 2.47 (0.59) 2.38 (0.54) 3.77 (0.63) <0.001***
 Low amounts of vehicle traffic
 Enough sidewalks
 Well-maintained sidewalks
 Well lighted at night
 Not many street intersections
Aesthetics 3.23 (0.58) 3.48 (0.50) 3.09 (0.53) 3.34 (0.70) <0.001***
 Well-maintained properties
 Many large and mature trees
 Natural features such as lakes, ponds, forests
 A variety of architectural styles
 Interesting things to see
Social environment 3.76 (0.63) 3.32 (0.59) 3.86 (0.54) 3.96 (0.68) <0.001***
 Little or no crime
 Physically active neighbours
 Frequent interaction with neighbours
 Many people walking around
Number of respondents 289 62 165 62

Notes:

The number refers to the mean of each variable in its corresponding neighbourhood. Standard errors are in parentheses. The difference refers to whether each variable is statistically significant across the three types of neighbourhoods, using the one-way ANOVA.

*

p≤0.05;

**

p≤0.01;

***

p≤0.001.