Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 17;28(3):341–350. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1198-9

Table 4.

Multiple informant logistic regression model combinations of total aggression scores for ASPD prediction, adjusted by sex and age

Model N Model variable OR 95% CIs AUC 95% CIs
PR12 + TR12 1240 PR12 1.2 0.9, 1.4 0.69 0.62, 0.75
TR12 1.5* 1.2, 1.8
Sex 1.9* 1.1, 3.3
TR14 + SR14 + TWR14 907 TR14 1.6* 1.3, 2.1 0.81 0.74, 0.88
SR14 1.8* 1.4, 2.4
TWR14 1.1 0.8, 1.6
Sex 1.2 0.5, 2.5
TR12 + TR14 982 TR12 1.3* 1.0, 1.7 0.74 0.67, 0.81
TR14 1.6* 1.3, 2.0
Sex 1.7 0.9, 3.2
PR12 + TR12 + TR14 939 PR12 1.2 0.9, 1.6 0.74 0.66, 0.82
TR12 1.2 0.9, 1.6
TR14 1.6* 1.3, 2.0
Sex 1.9 1.0, 3.6
SR14 + TWR14 1191 SR14 1.7* 1.3, 2.1 0.74 0.67, 0.81
TWR14 1.4* 1.1, 1.8
Sex 1.3 0.7, 2.3
PR12 + TR12 + TR14 + SR14 + TWR14 847 PR12 1.2 0.9, 1.6 0.82 0.76, 0.88
TR12 1.3 1.0, 1.8
TR14 1.5* 1.2, 1.9
SR14 1.7* 1.3, 2.2
TWR14 1.1 0.8, 1.5
Sex 1.3 0.6, 2.7
TR14 + SR14 992 TR14 1.6* 1.3, 2.0 0.80 0.73, 0.87
SR14 1.9* 1.5, 2.4
Sex 1.2 0.6, 2.4

PR parent rating, TR teacher rating, SR self rating, TWR co-twin rating, ASPD antisocial personality disorder, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, AUC area under the (receiver operating characteristic) curve

*p < 0.05