Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2017 Oct 24;13(4):482–496. doi: 10.1080/19320248.2017.1364188

TABLE 3.

Odds of using food sources by food security status among shoppers in communities of low income and low food access (n= 513)

Food Source Odds Ratio (Referent = high food security)
Odds for having used the source by food security category
Got food from any of the following places, past yeara Marginal Food Security Low Food Security Very Low Food Security
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
lower upper lower upper lower upper
Church/social services food box or basket 2.55 1.36 4.78 .004 2.75 1.52 4.96 <.001 2.89 1.57 4.78 <.001
Food bank or food pantry 4.08 2.06 8.06 <.001 3.30 1.74 6.27 <.001 5.94 3.06 11.53 <.001
Farmers’ marketb .85 .46 1.57 .60 1.19 .68 2.11 .54 1.15 .64 2.11 .60
Family, friend, neighbor 1.57 .76 3.22 .22 2.16 1.11 4.22 .02 4.03 2.16 7.90 <.001
Soup kitchen or shelter 2.74 1.17 6.41 .02 1.25 .53 2.94 .61 3.56 1.56 8.09 <.01
Hunted, fished, trapped .82 .39 1.77 .62 .97 .48 1.94 .93 .96 .46 1.97 .90
Community, school, church garden 3.95 .84 18.52 .08 5.01 1.13 22.28 .03 5.03 1.12 22.65 .04
Your own garden or animals 1.74 .69 4.39 .24 .79 .31 2.05 .63 0.86 .32 2.27 .75
Senior center meals 1.33 .41 4.27 .63 1.83 .63 5.33 .27 1.29 .42 3.99 .66
Home-delivered meals 1.73 .30 9.89 .54 1.56 .30 8.58 .61 3.66 .73 18.33 .11
Households with childrenb
Free or reduced school breakfast or lunch 1.09 .31 3.83 .90 1.19 .38 3.73 .77 1.23 .37 4.09 .73

Notes. Models adjusted for gender, race, educational level, number people shopped for in household, and household income.

a

Logistic regression convergence criteria were not satisfied for two items because of poor distribution and/or small numbers of “yes” responses in some food security categories: food provided free at work and food at an afterschool or summer program for children.

b

Households with one or more children, n = 171