. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 8.

Published in final edited form as: Addict Res Theory. 2017 Jul 20;26(4):267–274. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2017.1351552

Table 4.

APIM Results: Associations Between Prescription Drug Misuse and Parental Adjustment in Family Contexts

		Actor effects				Partner effects

		Fathers		Mothers		Fathers		Mothers
Alcohol problems^a		0.36	0.63	1.21^*	2.76	−0.29	−0.70	−0.21	−0.34
Positive affect^a		−1.63	−1.49	−2.07	−1.88	−2.49^*	−2.40	1.77	1.53
Negative affect^a		0.75	0.87	0.22	0.22	1.38	1.47	−0.36	−0.39
Depression^b	ASD status	−0.93	−0.59	5.87^*	3.34	−0.94	−0.51	−1.17	−0.79
	Comparison status	2.69	1.74	−0.49	−0.26	2.80	1.71	1.61	0.89
Physical health conditions^a		−0.11	−0.38	−0.41	−0.94	0.40	0.98	−0.16	−0.52
Sleep quality^a		−0.17	−1.48	−0.15	−1.18	−0.46^*	−3.64	−0.19	−1.60
Relationship satisfaction^a		−0.58	−0.22	−6.66^*	−2.20	1.23	0.40	−5.76^*	−2.28
Parenting strain^a		2.61^*	2.23	3.10^*	2.32	0.51	0.42	−0.56	−0.44

Note. Models account for the covariance between fathers’ and mothers’ medical use of prescription drugs, prescription drug misuse, and adjustment measures residuals, and the demographic covariates of education and income. Table presents unstandardized coefficients with t-values. Bolded results reflect a significant association (p < .05) after controlling for multiple tests conducted.

Associations did not vary by family status.

Results shown for different family statuses due to significant moderation effect.

p < .05.