Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;9:3984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40611-9

Table 5.

Summary on M-QTL and E-QTL by environment interaction for yield and yield components in BC/M and BC/P trials.

Trial Trait BC MPH RIL
M-QTLa n§ V(A)%c V(AE)%d n V(A)% V(AE)% n V(A)% V(AE)%
BC/M SY 11 0.72 1.07 7 0.65 1.29 17 1.44 0.63
LY 14 0.62 1.06 7 0.46 1.40 12 1.64 0.64
BNP 9 0.53 1.16 6 0.41 1.49 16 0.90 0.81
BW 13 1.33 0.59 5 0.65 0.96 22 1.98 0.31
LP 13 1.55 0.71 10 0.88 0.99 25 2.47 0.14
Total 60 35 92
E-QTL b n V(AA)% e V(AAE)% f n V(AA)% V(AAE)% n V(AA)% V(AAE)%
SY 13 1.06 1.45 13 0.91 1.78 59 2.31 0.65
LY 15 1.27 1.48 8 0.87 1.80 52 2.28 0.71
BNP 8 1.48 1.18 7 0.16 2.78 25 2.31 0.63
BW 3 2.93 1.21 0 - - 77 2.75 0.13
LP 36 1.99 0.58 8 1.48 1.33 101 2.67 0.20
Total 75 36 314
BC/P M-QTL n V(A)% V(AE)% n V(A)% V(AE)% n V(A)% V(AE)%
SY 7 2.58 0.50 4 1.44 1.09 10 2.25 0.41
LY 7 2.89 0.32 3 1.43 1.18 8 2.40 0.34
BNP 3 1.86 0.49 5 1.37 1.64 9 1.25 1.15
BW 4 2.35 0.75 5 0.87 1.54 11 2.88 0.23
LP 13 2.86 0.24 5 0.76 1.83 19 2.75 0.22
Total 34 22 57
E-QTL n V(AA)% V(AAE)% n V(AA)% V(AAE)% n V(AA)% V(AAE)%
SY 6 3.09 0.86 2 3.51 0.64 24 3.85 0.32
LY 6 2.96 0.72 5 3.35 0.46 24 3.72 0.33
BNP 14 2.39 1.39 6 1.72 1.77 10 2.13 1.78
BW 10 3.29 0.55 6 2.96 1.38 26 3.96 0.25
LP 21 2.97 0.21 2 0.65 2.80 31 3.23 0.14
Total 57 21 115

a,bThe main effect QTL (M-QTL) and epistasis QTL (E-QTL) by software ICIMapping 4.1. §The number of QTL. c,d,e,fThe proportion of phenotypic variation explained on average by single QTL (A), single QTL × environment interaction (AE), epistatic QTLs (AA), and epistatic QTLs × environment interaction (AAE) at the current scanning position, respectively.