. 2019 Feb 24;2019:3801639. doi: 10.1155/2019/3801639

Table 1.

Comparison of indexes among groups [M(P₂₅~ P₇₅)].

	CON	IFG	IGT	T1D	T2DCON	DN	DR	DPN
	(n=50)	(n=12)	(n=15)	(n=25)	(n=29)	(n=24)	(n=34)	(n=50)
Glu (mmol/L)	4.8	6.4¹	5.9^1,2	11.9^1,2,3	9.8^1,2,3	8.2^1,2,3	9.2^1,2,3	8. $8^{\begin{matrix} 1,2, 3 \end{matrix}}$
Glu (mmol/L)	(4.1-5.6)	(6.3-6.7)	(5.6-6.1)	(8.5-14.8)	(8.3-12.8)	(7.5-9.5)	(7.7-11.4)	(7.6-11.1)
HbA1c (%)	5.1	6.1¹	5.5²	11.3^1,2,3	8.5^1,2,3,4	8.5^1,2,3,4	8.6^1,2,3,4	8. $2^{\begin{matrix} 1,2, 3,4 \end{matrix}}$
HbA1c (%)	(4.2-6.0)	(5.9-6.2)	(5.4-5.7)	(10.3-12.8)	(7.7-8.9)	(8.0-8.8)	(8.0-8.9)	(7.2-8.7)
Cr (mg/L)	0.185	0.164	0.172	0.151	0.131¹	0.096¹	0.083^1,3,4	0.13 $5^{\begin{matrix} 1 \end{matrix}}$
Cr (mg/L)	(0.136-0.221)	(0.098-0.214)	(0.128-0.202)	(0.104-0.191)	(0.107-0.168)	(0.062-0.149)	(0.064-0.149)	(0.073-0.173)
UCr (mg/L)	0.034	0.038	0.023	0.120^1,2,3	0.050^1,3,4	0.040⁴	0.035⁴	0.04 $4^{\begin{matrix} 1,3, 4 \end{matrix}}$
UCr (mg/L)	(0.024-0.041)	(0.027-0.039)	(0.015-0.034)	(0.094-0.141)	(0.028-0.082)	(0.023-0.050)	(0.020-0.057)	(0.026-0.063)
Cr/UCr	5.329	5.511	7.353	1.270^1,2,3	2.750^1,3,4	2.525^1,3,4	3.232^1,3,4	3.16 $8^{\begin{matrix} 1,3, 4 \end{matrix}}$
Cr/UCr	(3.810-8.852)	(3.292-6.165)	(5.577-10.227)	(0.980-1.576)	(1.415-4.800)	(1.445-5.265)	(1.386-4.636)	(1.973-4.300)
Fe (mg/L)	1.697	2.087	2.116	1.857	2.014	1.447	1.539	1.841
Fe (mg/L)	(1.402-2.185)	(1.554-2.303)	(1.454-2.650)	(1.172-2.341)	(1.587-2.410)	(1.027-2.025)	(1.025-2.350)	(1.147-2.409)
UFe (mg/L)	0.335	0.466	0.279	1.140^1,2,3	0.450⁴	0.410⁴	0.290⁴	0.38 $5^{\begin{matrix} 4 \end{matrix}}$
UFe (mg/L)	(0.199-0.585)	(0.301-0.538)	(0.216-0.425)	(0.595-1.465)	(0.310-0.700)	(0.108-0.908)	(0.159-0.553)	(0.279-0.803)
Fe/UFe	4.784	4.382	7.343	1.803^1,2,3	3.744⁴	5.077	6.092	4.12 $0^{\begin{matrix} 4 \end{matrix}}$
Fe/UFe	(3.023-7.879)	(3.394-6.389)	(3.421-10.727)	(1.061-3.445)	(2.498-6.997)	(1.662-10.395)	(1.595-9.896)	(2.679-7.522)

UCr refers to urinary Cr; UFe refers to urinary Fe. ¹Compared with the CON group, there is significant difference. ²Compared with the IFG group, there is significant difference. ³Compared with the IGT group, there is significant difference. ⁴Compared with the T1D group, there is significant difference. ⁵Compared with the T2DCON group, there is significant difference. ⁶Compared with the DN group, there is significant difference.