Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep 10;17(6):1130–1137.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.007

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Distribution of the relationship between anal and rectal abnormal MEP latencies after TMS, TLMS and TSMS in FI patients

Only anal = the patient only had anal abnormal MEP (the rectal MEP was normal); Only rectal = the patient only had rectal abnormal MEP (the anal MEP was normal); Anal and rectal = both the anal and rectal MEPs were abnormal.