Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;10:393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00393

Table 1.

Summary of included studies.

References Context Number of participants Participant characteristics Study design Aim(s) Variables/Themes Results
Abeles and Hafeli, 2014 Symphony orchestra musicians 47 USA F16 M31 Qualitative: Semi-structured interview Explore motivations of musicians to contribute to school education programmes and assess how such participation affects career perceptions Motivations for participation Programme experiences Delivering the programme was experienced as an opportunity for professional development and led to positive relationships with the community, autonomy, self-expression and positive affect.
Allmendinger et al., 1996 Symphony orchestra musicians 1,123 UK, USA, Germany Mixed-methods: Interview Observation Questionnaire Archival documents Explore differences in orchestras and musicians' career profiles from the UK, USA and Germany Operational information Orchestra integrity Player involvement Resources Player recognition Recruitment procedures Satisfaction Career mobility Gender representation Perceptions on gender representation Musicians were satisfied with relationships with colleagues, though scored low for satisfaction with pay and management.
Ascenso et al., 2017 Classical musicians 6 Germany, Portugal, Spain, UK F3 M3 Age range 32–52 (mean = 43.17) Qualitative: Interview Diary Understand the well-being of professional musicians Developed from PERMA profiler Musicians had high well-being. Factors contributing to well-being included understanding identity, making music and relationships. Challenges to well-being included relationships with management, monotony in rehearsals and transition into the profession.
Bodner and Bensimon, 2008 Band musicians 38 Israel F8 M30 Age range 22–45 (mean = 28.82) Quantitative; 2 × 2 (condition × time) mixed model MANOVA Assess the adjustment of solo singers after performance and explore mental health Affect Self-esteem Purpose in life Mental Health Singers scored higher on purpose in life, negative affect and positive affect before performance compared to after. Higher well-being and lower distress were related to higher purpose in life after performance.
Brodsky, 2006 Symphony orchestra musicians 54 UK Age range 22–55 (mean = 35.5) Qualitative: Semi-structured interview Explore the occupational experiences of orchestral musicians Gains, risks and costs of orchestral career Factors contributing to well-being included relationships with colleagues, emotional satisfaction, sharing performances, task variety, learning, feelings of accomplishment. Challenges to well-being included maintaining relationships, cognitive effort required for performance, maladaptive coping, low autonomy and limited career progression.
Burgoyne et al., 1999 University student actors 15 USA Qualitative: Interview Understand the impact of acting on student actors N/A (Grounded theory approach) Contributors to well-being included development of empathetic and relationship skills and experiencing meaning. Challenges to well-being included relationships with directors, distressing content and maintaining personality characteristics.
Cooper et al., 1989 Popular musicians 70 UK M70 Age range 22–62 (mean = 40) Mixed-method: In-depth interview Questionnaire Assess the major sources of stress experienced by popular musicians Stress Personality Low job satisfaction was related to working with groups that lacked personal and professional cohesion.
Dobson, 2010b Classical and jazz musicians 18 UK F7 M11 Age range 21–34 (mean = 24.6) Qualitative: Semi-structured interview Explore the occupational demands placed on classical and jazz musicians and explore differences in experiences of autonomy Creativity Work Control Demands Lifestyle Well-being Identity, emotional investment and autonomy related to well-being. Musicians highly identified with their profession and experienced guilt after mistakes. Jazz players experienced greater autonomy compared to orchestral musicians.
Draugelis et al., 2014 University dance students 182 USA F157 M25 Age range 18–43 (mean = 20.4) Quantitative: Cross-sectional questionnaire Assess the contributions of motivational climate, dance performance anxiety and dance self-concept to well-being Motivational Climate Dance self-Concept Dance Anxiety Well-being Motivational climate and dance self-concept significantly related to well-being of dancers.
Johansson and Theorell, 2003 Orchestra musicians 250 Sweden F93 M155 Mean age = 39 Quantitative: Cross-sectional questionnaire Identify factors determining well-functioning groups and issues for orchestral musicians Orchestra status Job security Quality of work tasks Psychosocial factors Health Quality of work tasks, psychosocial factors and social support significantly correlated with well-being. Musicians in elite orchestras and those with lower support reported lower well-being.
Kenny et al., 2016a Orchestra musicians Survey n = 380 Physical examination n = 407 Australia F206 M198 Mean age = 42.1 Quantitative: Cross-sectional questionnaire Physical examination Explore factors impacting on health Performance-related musculoskeletal pain disorders (PRMD) Music performance anxiety Practice and organisational factors Prevalence of bullying Occupational satisfaction Job satisfaction was consistent across orchestra types. Musicians in stage orchestras were more satisfied with their workplace, employers, relationships with management, colleagues, pay and career progression.
Kivimaki and Jokinen, 1994 Orchestral musicians 93 Finland F28 M65 Quantitative: Cross-sectional questionnaire Assess job perceptions and well-being among musicians and compare results to other occupational groups Job perceptions Well-being Performance anxiety High job satisfaction was reported by 90% of musicians, which was significantly higher than other occupational groups. High job satisfaction correlated with high levels of skill variety and autonomy, and with fewer conflicts in interpersonal relationships.
Kubacki, 2008 Jazz musicians 16 UK, Poland F2 M14 Age range approx. 26–65 Qualitative: In-depth biographical interview Explore experiences of the creation of live performance Career experiences Organising function engagements was associated with negative affect. Participants reported both negative and positive relationships with the audience.
Mogelof and Rohrer, 2005 Symphony orchestra musicians Survey n = 66 Interview n = 22 USA F27 M39 Age range 23–74 (mean age = 45.94) Mixed-method case study: Cross-sectional questionnaire Interviews Explore how musicians cope with career frustrations and disappointments Job satisfaction Tenure Organisational status Coping behaviours Orchestral status was an important factor relating to well-being. Elite orchestral musicians were more satisfied although job satisfaction decreased over time. Non-elite orchestral musicians were more satisfied with contribution to governance, though were less satisfied with job security and pay.
Parasuraman and Purohit, 2000 Symphony orchestra musicians 63 USA F37 M26 Age range 22–63 (mean = 33.5) Quantitative: Cross-sectional questionnaire Assess the effects of organisational demands on psychological health and well-being Stressors Psychological distress Boredom stress Job dissatisfaction Job involvement Instrument group Occupational demands of task difficulty, performance anxiety, social tension, lack of artistic integrity and work environment correlated with job dissatisfaction.
Perkins et al., 2017 Current and graduated conservatoire music students 20 UK F15 M5 Age range 18–24 Qualitative; Semi-structured interviews Explore enablers and barriers to health and well-being in the conservatoire environment Attitudes to health and well-being Enablers and barriers to health and well-being Challenges to well-being included irregular schedules, time management, financial difficulties, teacher/pupil relationship, performance goals, comparison with peers, performance evaluation. Contributors to well-being included successful performance and relationships.
Quested et al., 2013 Dance conservatoire students 55 Hong Kong F41 M9 (mean age = 20.58) Quantitative: Diary methodology Assess relationships between autonomy support, basic psychological need satisfaction and changes in affective states across different dance situations Dance genre Perceived autonomy support Basic psychological need satisfaction Well-being Perceived autonomy support significantly predicted basic psychological need satisfaction. Basic psychological need satisfaction contributed to changes in affect.
Robb et al., 2018 Actors 20 Australia F10 M10 Age range 22–66 Qualitative: Semi-structured interviews Explore factors that impact the psychological well-being of actors Well-being Acting Demands Personal characteristics Challenges to well-being for actors included job insecurity, financial insecurity, maladaptive alcohol consumption, perfectionistic tendencies and distressing content. Contributors to well-being included career engagement, relationships with audiences, creative expression and personal growth. Relationships with colleagues were experienced as both contributing to and detracting from well-being.
Sandgren, 2002 Opera singers Interview n = 15 Survey n = 49 Sweden Qual: F8 M7 Age range 27–65 Quant: F25 M24 Age range 21–65 Mixed-methods: Semi-structured interviews Cross-sectional questionnaire Explore problems, coping strategies and motivation of opera singers and how these aspects relate to mental and physical health Demands Coping Motivational factors Somatic problems Depressive tendencies Addictive behaviour Worry Performance anxiety Inability to sing related to negative affect. Job insecurity, rehearsal schedules and avoidance of social environments impacted on personal relationships. Performance related to positive affect and mastery.
Smith, 1989 Retired symphony orchestra musicians 14 USA M14 Age range 57–90 Qualitative: Semi-structured interview Explore career experiences, medical problems and career perceptions Medical problems Career Job satisfaction related to being part of a successful team. Job dissatisfaction was related to relationships with colleagues, managing schedules and lack of recognition.