Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;13:41. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00041

Table 2.

Correlation matrixes of parameters selected based on the PLS analysis of MCSF parameters (X) and EPM, OF, and OF with start box parameters (Y).

D/F D/F D/F D/F
(A) center DCR hurdle TOTCORR
F box -0.25 -0.19 -0.51 0.39
D box 0.45 0.38 0.16 0.16
D/F box 0.47 0.29 0.55 -0.08
F closed arms -0.51 -0.04 -0.10 0.11
D closed arms -0.04 0.34 -0.29 0.01
D/F closed arms 0.52 0.04 0.07 -0.10

F D D/F
(B) bridge bridge bridge

F open arms 0.08 0.20 0.32
D open arms 0.34 0.43 0.18
D/F open arms 0.47 0.46 -0.15
Total activity EPM 0.29 0.36 0.14
Distance EPM 0.63* 0.62* -0.05
Velocity EPM 0.01 0.13 0.31
Rearing EPM 0.88*** 0.76** -0.17
F D D/F Distance Velocity

(C) center center center center center

Total activity OF 0.60* 0.82** -0.02 0.57 0.01
Distance OF 0.43 0.85*** 0.10 0.52 -0.15
Velocity OF 0.59* 0.81** -0.17 0.65* 0.03
Rearing OF 0.61* 0.80** -0.18 0.64* -0.06

Data are presented as Spearman’s rho (ρ), p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 Spearman rank correlation test. D, duration; D/F, duration per visit; EPM, elevated plus maze; F, frequency; MCSF, multivariate concentric square field; OF, open field; PLS, partial least squares projections to latent structures; TOTCORR, total corridor.