Table 5.

Rating of keywords for the 19 systems on the 5 key metrics.

Publication	Effectiveness		Efficiency		Ease of learning		User satisfaction		Cognitive load
	Ratinga	Maximum Weighted Score=20 points	Ratinga	Maximum Weighted Score=20 points	Ratinga	Maximum Weighted Score=20 points	Ratinga	Maximum Weighted Score=20 points	Ratinga	Maximum Weighted Score=20 points
Nucita, 2009 [12]	4	16	3	12	3	12	4	16	—b	—
Coetsee, 2014 [13]	3	12	3	12	—	—	3	12	—	—
Darcy et al, 2010 [14]	3	12	3	12	3	12	4	16	3	12
Ohemeng-Dapaaha et al, 2010 [15]	3	12	3	12	—	—	2	8	—	—
Tilahun and Fleur, 2015 [16]	2	8	2	8	3	12	2	8	4	16
Kmadjeu at al, 2005 [17]	3	12	3	12	3	12	3	12	4	16
United Nations Development Programme, 2014 [18]	3	12	4	16	—	—	4	12	3	12
Mbananga et al, 2002 [19]	3	12	3	12	—	—	2	8	—	—
Tierney et al, 2010 [20]	3	12	3	12	—	—	4	16	—	—
Mensah et al, 2015 [21]	3	12	3	12	—	—	—	—	3	12
Haskew et al, 2015 [22]	5	20	—	—	4	16	—	—	3	12
Castelnuovo et al, 2012 [23]	5	20	3	12	4	16	3	12	3	12
Manders et al, 2010 [24]	3	12	3	12	4	16	3	12	—	—
Newman et al, 2011 [25]	3	12	4	16	4	16	3	12	3	12
Guylain et al, 2015 [26]	3	12	—	—	4	16	—	—	2	8
Open MRS, 2015 [27]	3	12	4	16	3	12	3	12	5	20
Chaplin et al, 2015 [28]	5	20	3	12	4	16	4	16	4	16
Amoroso et al, 2010 [29]	4	16	4	16	4	16	2	8	3	12
Douglas et al, 2010 [30]	3	12	—	—	3	12	5	20	4	16

^aRating: Excellent=5, Good=4, Fair=3, Poor=2, Bad=1.

^bNot applicable.