Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 2;17(2):98. doi: 10.3390/md17020098

Table 1.

NMR spectroscopic data for saccharoquinoline (1) in DMSO-d6, δ in ppm a.

No. 1
δC, mult. b δH (J in Hz) COSY HMBC
1 38.5, CH2 0.99, brd; 1.83, d (14.3) 2
2 18.0, CH2 1.44, m c; 1.66, m c 1, 3
3 41.3, CH2 1.18 c; 1.39 c 2
4 32.8, C
5 55.3, CH 1.08 c 4, 6, 10, 12, 14
6 19.3, CH2 1.42, m c; 1.74, mc 7
7 40.3, CH2 1.73 c; 2.15, dt (12.3, 3.6) 6
8 78.1, C
9 51.2, CH 1.67 c 11 8, 10, 11, 14, 15
10 36.6, C
11 17.9, CH2 2.69, dd (16.8, 5.2); 2.91, dd (16.8, 13.1) 9 8, 9, 1′, 6′
12 21.5, CH3 0.85, s 3, 4, 5, 13
13 33.2, CH3 0.90, s 3, 4, 5, 12
14 14.6, CH3 0.94, s 1, 5, 9, 10
15 20.3, CH3 1.18, s 7, 8, 9
1′ 104.9, C
2′ 122.8, C
3′ 133.6, C
4′ 135.0, C
5′ 136.9, C
6′ 145.8, C
7′ 132.1, CH 8.40, d (8.6) 8′ 1′, 3′, 9′
8′ 116.9, CH 7.92, d (8.6) 7′ 2′
9′ 140.8, C
10′ 165.6, C
4′-OH 9.54, s 3′, 4′, 5′

a 300 MHz for 1H NMR and 75 MHz for 13C NMR. b Numbers of attached protons were determined by analysis of 2D NMR spectroscopic data (500 MHz). c Overlapping signals.