Table 2.
Additive effects of QTLs for grain appearance detected by ICIM-ADD in two years.
| S. no. | QTL | Chr | Position (cM) | Flanking markers | LODa | PVEb | Additive effectc | The contribution of the favorable allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | qHGL_1 (2014) | 1 | 178 | RM490-RM2318 | 10.26 | 5.01 | 10.57 | A |
| 2 | qCH_9 (2014) | 9 | 77 | RM23904-RM24432 | 2.95 | 6.7 | 0.23 | A |
| 3 | qCH_12 (2014) | 12 | 54 | RM270-RM27956 | 8.1 | 5.06 | 10.25 | A |
| 4 | qBGL_6 (2015) | 6 | 52 | RM225-RM3183 | 3.01 | 4.02 | -0.07 | K |
| 5 | qHGL_9 (2015) | 9 | 77 | RM23904-RM24432 | 2.86 | 7.22 | 0.23 | A |
| 6 | qSW_9 (2015) | 9 | 78 | RM23904-RM24432 | 2.57 | 6.08 | 0.21 | A |
| 7 | qSW_9-1 (2015) | 9 | 82 | RM23904-RM24432 | 3.02 | 10.18 | 0.11 | A |
aInterval of the LOD peak value for QTL; binterval of the LOD peak value for QTL; cpositive additive effect of QTL came from Ali-Kazemi, while negative effect came from Kadous.