TABLE 4.
Hypothesis-driven dietary pattern score | Exploratory dietary pattern score | |||||
Total n | Model 1 | Model 2 | No. of cases | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
Overall | 354 | 1.24 (1.10, 1.39) | 1.25 (1.10, 1.43) | 171 | 1.57 (1.31, 1.89) | 1.56 (1.29, 1.88) |
Age | ||||||
≤67.6 y | 178 | 1.22 (1.04, 1.43) | 1.24 (1.03, 1.48) | 82 | 1.43 (1.13, 1.82) | 1.46 (1.14, 1.87) |
>67.6 y | 176 | 1.26 (1.05, 1.51) | 1.25 (1.01, 1.54) | 89 | 1.77 (1.32, 2.38) | 1.74 (1.28, 2.37) |
P-interaction | — | 0.831 | 0.995 | — | 0.258 | 0.282 |
Sex | ||||||
M | 202 | 1.24 (1.08, 1.43) | 1.35 (1.14, 1.61) | 97 | 1.42 (1.13, 1.79) | 1.47 (1.15, 1.87) |
F | 152 | 1.24 (0.98, 1.56) | 1.18 (0.93, 1.50) | 74 | 1.82 (1.34, 2.48) | 1.88 (1.36, 2.62) |
P-interaction | — | 0.928 | 0.808 | — | 0.243 | 0.228 |
BMI | ||||||
M: <26.7 kg/m2; F: <27.0 kg/m2 | 177 | 1.10 (0.94, 1.29) | 1.10 (0.91, 1.32) | 66 | 1.70 (1.26, 2.29) | 1.67 (1.22, 2.29) |
M: ≥26.7 kg/m2; F: ≥27.0 kg/m2 | 177 | 1.44 (1.18, 1.75) | 1.50 (1.21, 1.87) | 105 | 1.37 (1.07, 1.76) | 1.37 (1.07, 1.77) |
P-interaction | — | 0.105 | 0.082 | — | 0.301 | 0.312 |
Type 2 diabetes | ||||||
No | 299 | 1.20 (1.05, 1.36) | 1.23 (1.06, 1.43) | 136 | 1.49 (1.22, 1.82) | 1.49 (1.22, 1.82) |
Yes | 55 | 1.63 (1.14, 2.33) | 1.74 (1.15, 2.64) | 35 | 2.34 (1.17, 4.65) | 3.09 (1.30, 7.33) |
P-interaction | — | 0.258 | 0.280 | — | 0.236 | 0.271 |
Alcohol consumption2 | ||||||
≤20 g/d | 286 | 1.10 (0.96, 1.27) | 1.12 (0.96, 1.31) | 134 | 1.57 (1.24, 1.98) | 1.57 (1.24, 1.99) |
>20 g/d | 68 | 1.85 (1.29, 2.65) | 2.34 (1.44, 3.80) | 37 | 1.68 (1.16, 2.44) | 1.78 (1.14, 2.79) |
Model 1 was adjusted for age (y) and sex (M or F) except sex strata. Model 2 was adjusted for age (y), sex (M or F) except sex strata, years of education (≤9, 10, or ≥11 y), smoking status (never, former, or current), smoking duration (y), physical activity (metabolic equivalent task hours/wk), and total energy intake (kcal/d).
No P-interaction is shown because alcohol consumption was included in dietary pattern scores.