Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 18;27(2):1597–1612. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.001597

Table 2. Quantitative comparison of fluorescent signal level between P-IMS and HS-IMS systems. Three arbitrary selected microspheres (FluoSpheres, #F8841, Thermo-Fisher) were imaged at 30, 20, 10 and 5 ms exposure times respectively. Averaged (168 images) intensity values integrated over spatial and spectral voxels of selected beads for both systems are given in columns ItotHS-IMS and ItotM-IMS. Count of photo-electrons recorded by HS-IMS and P-IMS systems over spatio-spectral voxels of each bead is given in Ie-HS-IMS and Ie-M-IMS respectively. Please note that signal recorded by P-IMS was multiplied by 0.5 to account for 2x binning in y direction.

Exposure time [ms] ItotHS-IMS [a.u.] Ie-HS-IMS [e-] ItotM-IMS [a.u.] Ie-M-IMS[e-] Ie-HS-IMS/Ie-M-IMS
Bead #1 30 1371800 664170 154040 139660 4.7
20 908570 457920 107000 97018 4.7
10 464090 233900 51466 46664 5.0
5 231210 116530 23784 21565 5.4
Bead #2 30 1696400 854990 190380 172620 4.9
20 1175200 592300 131220 118980 5.0
10 594710 299730 62994 57117 5.4
5 273870 138030 28272 25634 5.2
Bead #3 30 1193700 601620 149070 135160 4.4
20 789850 398080 103090 93472 4.3
10 413270 208290 50468 45759 4.5
5 194050 97801 24887 22565 4.3