Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 1;96(6):898–907. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150407

Table 5.

Reliability in the Waking-Hour Time Framea

Measurement Tool Activity Intensity Duration, min/d, X̅ (SD) Differenceb (95% CI) Significance of F Testc ICC (95% CI)
Week 1 Week 2
ACT Light (min/d) 64.0 (33.3) 63.6 (37.4) 0.3 (–11.5, 12.2) .96 .86 (.66, .94)
Moderate (min/d) 9.9 (12.8) 8.3 (7.7) 1.6 (–2.8, 5.9) .46 .82d (.56, .93)
Light to moderate (min/d) 73.8 (42.9) 71.9 (43.9) 1.9 (–13.0, 16.8) .79 .86 (.65, .94)
No. of steps/d 4,506 (2,045) 4,352 (1,693) 154 (–446, 754) .60 .89 (.70, .96)
SWA Light (min/d) 134.0 (88.9) 147.7 (91.0) –12.7 (–34.0, 8.6) .23 .94 (.85, .98)
Moderate (min/d) 45.1 (39.6) 43.8 (34.3) 1.3 (–8.3, 10.9) .78 .93 (.83, .97)
Light to moderate (min/d) 180.1 (117.6) 191.5 (114.8) –11.5 (–39.3, 16.4) .40 .94 (.85, .98)
No. of steps/d 5,992 (3,483) 6,002 (3,127) –10 (–774, 754) .98 .96 (.89, .98)
a

Daily physical activity duration and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in 21 participants with matching data from the Actigraph (ACT) and the SenseWear Armband (SWA) in the waking-hour time frame during the 2 weeks of data collection.

b

Difference between week 1 and week 2 and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).

c

Significance of the F test from the analysis of variance used to calculate ICCs.

d

The point estimates of the ICCs from the ACT were not contained in the 95% Cls of the ICCs from the SWA for the duration of moderate activities.