Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Control. 2018 May 9;28(2):220–226. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054290

Table 5.

Logistic regression psychological risk factors, community compliance with point-of-sale laws and covariates (n=1373)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Intention to use Ease of access
Male 1.74* 1.01 2.99 1.17 0.84 1.61
Age (referent=11–13 years)
 14 0.91 0.52 1.61 0.70* 0.52 0.93
 15–17 0.92 0.48 1.77 0.88 0.66 1.17
Muslim 0.99 0.52 1.89 1.06 0.56 2.02
Has pocket money 2.35*** 1.58 3.49 1.35* 1.02 1.78
Parent tobacco use (referent=none)
 One parent 1.50 0.88 2.55 1.21 0.79 1.85
 Both parents 1.64 0.69 3.90 0.27 0.07 1.02
Has friends who use tobacco 3.71*** 2.22 6.19 1.55* 1.09 2.20
Tobacco easy to access 2.0*** 1.37 2.92
Positive tobacco attitudes score 1.76** 1.22 2.54 1.61** 1.21 2.14
Tobacco prevention education at school 1.04 0.84 1.29 1.06 0.91 1.24
School fees (referent=low)
 Middle 1.85 0.75 4.53 0.78 0.49 1.23
 High 3.57 0.99 2.89 0.92 0.64 1.32
Community-level vendor compliance (referent=low)
 Low-middle 0.70 0.35 1.39 1.55 1.08 2.21
 Middle-high 0.51 0.22 1.19 0.98 0.66 1.45
 High 0.50 0.20 1.23 0.73 0.52 1.02

Models were further adjusted for number of tobacco vendors and number of tobacco ads.

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001,

p=0.063.