Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;22(8):1406–1414. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003282

Table 4.

Association between CANTAB cognitive testing outcomes and HAZ for the whole cohort of Malawian children (n 326)

CANTAB outcome Unadjusted regression of CANTAB outcomes v. HAZ Adjusted (age, sex, HIV, SES) regression of CANTAB outcomes v. HAZ
Unit difference 95 % CI P Unit difference 95 % CI P
BLC % correct 0·80 −0·18, 1·79 0·11 0·94 −0·10, 1·97 0·08
IED total errors −0·61 −10·0, 8·80 0·90 2·05 −7·25, 11·35 0·66
MOT mean error −0·24 −0·52, 0·05 0·11 −0·24 −0·50, 0·07 0·13
MOT mean latency (ms) −60·5 −107, −13·2 0·01* −66·0 −115, −16·7 0·009*
PAL total errors −0·27 −7·5, 6·9 0·94 0·53 −6·9, 8·0 0·88
PAL total errors (six shapes) −0·21 −2·3, 1·8 0·84 0·06 −2·1, 2·2 0·95
PRM % correct 0·65 −1·15, 2·45 0·48 0·48 −1·25, 2·22 0·58

CANTAB, Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery; HAZ, height-for-age Z-score; SES, socio-economic status; BLC, Big/Little Circle; MOT, Motor Screening Test; PAL, Paired Associated Learning; PRM, Pattern Recognition Memory.

*

Indicates significant difference (P < 0·05).