Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2018 Nov 15;46(3):237–244. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180071

Table 3:

Factors associated with Subsequent RA Treatment Failure* for Patients RA Who Added or Switched Treatments, Conditional on MBDA Score Improvement (n=1,517)

Adjusted** Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
MBDA score change at time of re-assessment
 Most Improvement (>16 units)
 Some Improvement (>8–16 units)
 Minimal to No Improvement <8 units)

1.0 (referent)
1.50 (1.03 – 2.19)
2.47(1.79 – 3.40)
Age (5 year increments) 0.88 (0.83–0.93)
Female sex (male referent) 1.27 (0.94 – 1.70)
Low income*** 0.95 (0.74, 1.24)
Race (Caucasian referent)
 Black
 Other

0.93 (0.63–1.38)
1.26 (0.98–1.63)
Fibromyalgia 1.33 (1.05, 1.70)
RA medications
 TNFi biologic
 Non-TNFi biologic
 MTX
 HCQ/SSZ/LEF
 Glucocorticoid

1.49 (1.08 – 2.04)
1.50 (0.87 – 2.56)
0.87 (0.70 – 1.09)
1.03 (0.83 – 1.28)
1.22 (0.99–1.51)

CI: Confidence interval; HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine; LEF: leflunomide; MBDA: Multi-biomarker disease activity; MTX: Methotrexate; RA: Rheumatoid arthritis; SSZ : Sulfasalazine; TNFi: Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor.

*

proxied by subsequently adding or switching to a new biologic or Janus kinase inhibitor

**

also adjusted for diabetes, chronic pulmonary disease, obesity, low income, disabled, inpatient hospitalization, number of ambulatory visits, and Charlson co-morbidity index, none of which were significant

***

reflected by state buy-in for Medicare premiums