Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;11:2039–2050. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S189026

Table S3.

Sensitivity analysis for pooled sensitivities and corresponding heterogeneities

A

Studya SEN (95% CI) I2 index (%) Pb

Porzycki et al1 0.91(0.87–0.94) 0 0.43
Yang et al2,c 0.90 (0.85–0.94) 0 0.58
Yang et al2,d 0.90 (0.85–0.93) 0 0.75
Gao et al3 0.92 (0.88–0.95) 0 0.58
Huang et al4 0.92 (0.87–0.95) 0 0.61
Kotb et al5 0.91(0.88–0.94) 0 0.434

B

Studya SEN (95% CI) I2 index (%) Pb

Zhu et al6 0.73(0.66–0.79) 78.3 0.01
Huang et al7 0.72 (0.66–0.76) 71.3 0.03
Chen et al8,c 0.71 (0.65–0.76) 68.5 0.04
Chen et al8,d 0.76 (0.70–0.80) 33.4 0.22

Notes: (A) miR-21, (B) miR-30c.

a

Given named study is omitted.

b

P-value of the Cochrane-Q test.

c

Control group consisted of patients with benign prostate disease.

d

Control group consisted of healthy people.