Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Feb 12;130(4):515–520. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.018

Table 1:

Correlation of QBA with the EIM parameters of muscle groups of DMD patients.

EIM-50 kHz
Rho (p-value)
EIM 100/300
Rho (p-value)
EIM-slope
Rho (p-value)
Muscle groups Time point Correlation with QBA
Six-Muscles Baseline (n=34) −0.66 (<0.01) −0.41 (0.02) 0.29 (0.09)
6 months (n=22) −0.64 (<0.01) −0.61 (<0.01) 0.67 (<0.01)
12 months (n=20) −0.58 (<0.01) −0.65 (<0.01) 0.65 (<0.01)
Proximal Baseline (n=33) −0.66 (<0.01) −0.57 (<0.01) 0.47 (<0.01)
6 months (n=22) −0.69 (<0.01) −0.72 (<0.01) 0.76 (<0.01)
12 months (n=20) −0.59 (<0.01) −0.64 (<0.01) 0.64 (<0.01)
Distal Baseline (n=34) −0.63 (<0.01) 0.32 (0.06) 0.25 (0.16)
6 months (n=22) −0.59 (<0.01) −0.53 (0.01) 0.56 (<0.01)
12 months (n=20) 0.42 (0.07) −0.57 (0.01) 0.62 (<0.01)
Upper Baseline (n=33) −0.71 (<0.01) −0.45 (<0.01) 0.40 (0.02)
6 months (n=20) −0.82 (<0.01) −0.62 (<0.01) 0.59 (<0.01)
12 months (n=20) −0.60 (<0.01) −0.66 (<0.01) 0.68 (<0.01)
Lower Baseline (n=34) −0.52 (<0.01) 0.23 (0.20) 0.15 (0.40)
6 months (n=22) −0.60 (<0.01) −0.55 (<0.01) 0.56 (<0.01)
12 months (n=20) 0.33 (0.16) 0.36 (0.12) 0.39 (0.08)