Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 21;12(3):441–450. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.01.018

Table 1.

Discriminant Analysis Classifies One-Third of Transplanted Animals as WT

Mouse Number Groupa Genotypeb Predicted Genotypec Probability WTd
1 Saline WT WT 1.0000
2 Saline WT WT 1.0000
3 Saline WT WT 1.0000
4 Saline WT WT 1.0000
5 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
6 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
7 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
8 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
9 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
10 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
11 Saline VWM VWM 0.0000
12e A2B5 VWM WT 1.0000
13e A2B5 VWM WT 1.0000
14e A2B5 VWM WT 1.0000
15 A2B5 VWM VWM 0.0000
16 A2B5 VWM VWM 0.0000
17 A2B5 VWM VWM 0.0000
18 A2B5 VWM VWM 0.0004
19 A2B5 VWM VWM 0.0003
20 GLAST VWM VWM 0.0005
21 GLAST VWM VWM 0.0000
22 GLAST VWM VWM 0.0246
23e GLAST VWM WT 0.9998
24 GLAST VWM VWM 0.0000
25 GLAST VWM VWM 0.0000
26 PDGFαR VWM VWM 0.0000
27 PDGFαR VWM VWM 0.0000
28 PDGFαR VWM VWM 0.0000
29e PDGFαR VWM WT 0.9999
30e PDGFαR VWM WT 0.9992

See also Table S1.

a

Saline = saline-injected mice; A2B5, GLAST, and PDGFαR = mice injected with primary mouse cells sorted on marker expression of the named proteins.

b

Genotype of mice: WT, wild-type mice; VWM, vanishing white matter mice.

c

Predicted genotype according to discriminant analysis.

d

Probability of a mouse to have a WT genotype according to the discriminant analysis.

e

Underlining indicates transplanted animals that were classified as WT in the discriminant analysis.