Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 20;48(4):336–349. doi: 10.1007/s13280-018-1085-0

Table 3.

TWofE values of socioeconomic and biophysical forces. TF temperate forests, A agriculture, S scrublands, TEF tropical evergreen forests, TDF tropical dry forests, G grasslands

TF to A S to A TEF to A TDF to A G to A
1993–2002 2002–2007 1993–2002 2002–2007 1993–2002 2002–2007 1993–2002 2002–2007 1993–2002 2002–2007
Socioeconomic
 Index of marginalization 0.19 0.18 0.27 0.29 0.19 0.21 0.18 0.04 0.44 0.39
 Distance to human settlements 0.61 0.51 0.69 0.73 0.29 0.34 0.35 0.41 0.42 0.55
 Distance to roads 0.47 0.48 0.59 0.36 0.47 0.45 0.32 0.38 0.64 0.60
 Distance to NPAs 0.23 0.24 0.63 0.43 0.06 0.11 0.24 0.09 0.80 0.64
 GDPa 0.54 0.84 0.38 0.51 0.64 0.71 0.46 0.29 1.12 0.65
 Populationa 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.13 0.82 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.14 0.27
Biophysical
 Altitude 0.23 0.28 0.54 0.37 0.13 0.30 0.27 0.14 0.98 0.62
 Slope 0.46 0.59 0.55 0.43 0.16 0.13 0.36 0.36 0.49 0.52
 AI 0.29 0.24 0.72 0.52 0.37 0.28 0.29 0.15 0.94 0.62
 PET 0.46 0.53 0.29 0.28 0.34 0.23 0.34 0.32 1.06 0.63
 TSD 0.47 0.27 0.30 0.43 0.41 0.29 0.42 0.28 1.09 0.57

aFor GDP, per capita GDP, population or population density variables only was selected one among these combination depending on their WofE and the correlation before modelling. The selection varied according to every transition