Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar;224:11–22. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.047

Table 4.

Interactions between sex, socio-economic status and visits to land-uses.

Adjusted for home and distance from home
IRR P LL 95% CI UL 95% CI
i) Interactions by sex
Leisure centre
Male REF
Female 52.86 0.01 2.64 1058.56
Private gardens
Male REF
Female 1.05 0.88 0.57 1.93
Playing fields
Male REF
Female 0.01 0.24 0.00 29.20
Public Park
Male REF
Female 0.19 0.50 0.00 22.51
Play park
Male REF
Female
1.02
0.99
0.10
9.82

Adjusted for home and distance from home1
IRR
P
LL 95% CI
UL 95% CI
ii) Interactions by socio-economic status
Leisure centre
Less deprived REF
Most deprived 0.46 0.76 0.00 62.80
Private gardens
Less deprived REF
Most deprived 1.38 0.30 0.75 2.51
Playing fields
Less deprived REF
Most deprived 1274.11 0.00 14.59 111301.72
Public Park
Less deprived REF
Most deprived 0.28 0.32 0.02 3.42
Play park
Less deprived REF
Most deprived 62.80 0.00 14.44 273.14

Note: Interaction models included adjustment for all land-use characteristics in main outcome model.