Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;10:211. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00211

Table 4.

Performance variables obtained from the Vpeak test, tlim test, and 5-km running performance for both groups at pre and post-training.

Variables PLA (n = 15)
PBMG (n = 15)
Magnitude-based inference analysis
Pre-training Post-training Cohen’s ES pre × post [CI 95%] Pre-training Post-training Cohen’s ES pre × post [CI 95%] Time effect (F; P) Interaction Time × group (F; P) Cohen’s ES [CI 95%] % chances (positive/trivial/negative) Qualitative inference
Vpeak (km ⋅ h−1) 13.4 ± 1.1 14.4 ± 1.0 0.82 [0.65 – 1.00] 13.4 ± 1.2 14.6 ± 1.0 1.01 [0.77 – 1.25] 178.39;<0.001 2.282; 0.142 0.21 [−0.08 – 0.50] 53/47/0 Possibly positive for PBMG
HRmax from Vpeak test (bpm) 193 ± 9.3 187 ± 7.3 −0.56 [−0.87 – −0.26] 196 ± 10.7 189 ± 9.8 −0.56 [−0.68 – −0.44] 59.733; < 0.001 0.271; 0.606 −0.08 [−0.38 – 0.23] 4/76/20 Very Unlikely
RPEmax from Vpeak test (6–20) 19.7 ± 0.6 19.9 ± 0.4 0.31 [−0.17 – 0.38] 19.7 ± 0.8 19.9 ± 0.3 0.31 [−0.20 – 0.82] 3.430; 0.075 0.070; 0.793 0.09 [−0.60 – 0.78] 37/43/20 Unclear
tlim (min) 6.6 ± 0.7 6.9 ± 1.1 0.46 [−0.62 – 1.53] 6.6 ± 1.1 6.8 ± 1.2 0.23 [−0.47 – 0.92] 1.290; 0.266 0.013; 0.910 −0.06 [−1.18 – 1.06] 32/28/40 Unclear
HRmax from tlim test (bpm) 188 ± 9.6 186 ± 8.0 −0.18 [−.048 – 0.11] 192 ± 10.6 187 ± 9.5 −0.42 [−0.56 – −0.28] 17.983;<0.001 3.393; 0.076 −0.27 [−0.57 – 0.03] 0/32/67 Possibly positive
RPEmax form tlim test (6–20) 19.9 ± 0.3 19.8 ± 0.4 −0.49 [−1.54 – 0.56] 19.9 ± 0.4 19.9 ± 0.5 0.00 [−0.59 – 0.59] 0.606; 0.443 0.606; 0.443 0.41 [−0.64 – 1.47] 66/22/12 Unclear
t5–km (min) 27.0 ± 3.3 24.1 ± 2.5 −0.82 [−1.04 – −0.61] 27.6 ± 3.0 23.9 ± 2.2 −1.18 [−1.48 – −0.88] 135.46;<0.001 2.218; 0.148 −0.26 [−0.61 – 0.10] 1/37/63 Possibly positive for PBMG

PLA, placebo group; PBMG, PBM group; ES, effect size; Vpeak, peak running velocity; HRmax, maximal heart rate; RPEmax, maximal rating of perceived exertion; tlim, time limit; t5-km, 5-km time. P < 0.05 compared with pre-training in the same group.