Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;20(4):892. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040892

Table 3.

Study characteristics regarding Anti-nuclear auto-antibodies.

Studies Type of Study Type of Auto-Antibodies Study Group Control Group Clinical Pregnancy Rate Live Birth/Ongoing Pregnancy Rate Miscarriage Rate
Study Group Control Group Study Group Control Group Study Group Control Group
Chen et al., 2017 [11] Prospective −ANA −178 ANA(+) Women −844 ANA(-) Women 55.60% 61% 50.56% 55.90% 9.10% 8.30%
Fan et al., 2017 [76] Not provided −ANA
−Anti-dsDNA
−52 ANA(+) and Anti-dsDNA(+) Women
−86 ANA(+) and Anti-dsDNA(−) Women
-121 ANA(−) and Anti-dsDNA(−) Women 11.5%
30.2%
47.10% 0%
18.6%
36.30% 100%
38.5%
22.80%
Li et al., 2015 [77] Not provided −ANA −204 ANA(+) Women -313 ANA(+) Women 27.72% 45.03% 21.78% 43.50% 21.43% 3.39%
Ying et al., 2013 [79] Retrospective −ANA
−ACA
−20 ANA(+) and ACA(+) Women
−51 ANA(+) and ACA(-) Women
−116 ANA(−) and ACA(−) Women 25%
35.3%
53.40 n/a n/a n/a n/a
Zhu et al., 2013 [80] Retrospective −ANA −66 ANA(+) Women −233 ANA(−) Women 17.30% 56.50% 9.61% 51.10% 44.40% 9.62%
Ying et al., 2013 [78] Not provided −ANA −50 ANA(+) Women −50 ANA (−) Women 28% 52% n/a n/a n/a n/a
Ying et al., 2012 [68] Not provided −ANA −66 ANA(+) Women −233 ANA(−) Women 28.10% 46.40% n/a n/a n/a a n/a a

a: In Ying et al., 2012 study miscarriage rates was provided per gestational sacks, thus, information on miscarriages per clinical pregnancy could not be extracted.