Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 7;4(2):122–135.

Table 3B.

Posttreatment comparison of resveratrol and placebo treated subjects

Clinical Measurement Placebo (n=14) Resveratrol (n=14) p

Mean±SD CI 95% Mean±SD CI 95%
Clamp M (mg/kg/min) 4.2±1.4 3.4–5.0 4.6±1.8 3.6–5.6 0.525

Insulin (mg/dl) 17±8 13–21 20±16 10–29 0.537

HOMA (%) 4.4±2.2 3.1–5.7 5.0±5.2 2.0–7.0 0.698

120 min data 2 h GTT (mg/dl) 172±39 150–195 139±13 120–158 0 0.023*

AUC (mg/dl) 346±64 309–383 304±42 280–328 0.050*

WBC (k/mcl) 5.9±1.3 5.1–6.7 5.2±1.5 4.3–6.1 0.209

CRP (mg/dl) 0.40±0.20 0 0.28–0.52 0.60±0.41 0.36–0.84 0.111

REE (k/cal/d) 1798±225 1662–1934 1778±228 1640–1976 0.821

BMI (kg/m2) 33.7±3.3 31.8–35.6 34.9±3.0 33.2–36.7 0.331

Comparison of the posttreatment metabolic syndrome characteristics (3A) and laboratory data and BMI (3B) for the total group of resveratrol and placebo treated subjects. *P≤ 0.05. GTT: Oral glucose tolerance test, AUC: Area under the curve, HOMA: Homeostatic model assessment, assesses insulin resistance and beta cell function, WBC: White blood cell count, CRP: C-reactive protein, TG: Serum triglycerides, REE: Resting energy expenditure, BMI:Body mass index, SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval.