Table 2.
Level | Differential Diagnosis/Symptom Prevalence Study |
1a | Systematic review (with homogeneity) of prospective cohort studies |
1b | Prospective cohort study with good follow-up |
1c | All or none case-series |
2a | Systematic review (with homogeneity) of 2b and better studies |
2b | Retrospective cohort study, or poor follow-up |
2c | Ecological studies |
3a | Systematic review (with homogeneity) of 3b and better studies |
3b | Non-consecutive cohort study, or very limited population |
4 | Case-series or superseded reference standards |
5 | Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or “first principles” |
Grade | Levels of Individual Studies |
A | Consistent level 1 studies |
B | Consistent level 2 or 3 studies or extrapolations from level 1 studies |
C | Level 4 studies or extrapolations from level 2 or 3 studies |
D | Level 5 evidence or troublingly inconsistent or inconclusive studies of any level |
Table adapted from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine [18].