Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 19;11(2):435. doi: 10.3390/nu11020435

Table 3.

Logistic regression analyses adjusted for age and sex relating participants’ positive perception on text message dietary feedback to the actual change in food group serves (by 0.5 serves). Effects are represented as odds-ratio and associated 95% confidence intervals. Odds-ratio represents the increase in the likelihood of participants who agreed compared to those who disagreed, that the text messages made them think about how much they ate and their actual intake.

Actual Change in Food Group Serves (by 0.5 Serve)
Perception Questions 1 Increased Vegetables Decreased EDNP Foods Increased Fruit Decreased SSB Decreased Alcohol Decreased Total EDNP Foods and Beverages
Vegetables 4.28 (1.76–10.39)
p = 0.001
2.78 (1.28–6.04)
p = 0.010
2.41 (1.10–5.27)
p = 0.027
- - 2.39 (1.1–5.10)
p = 0.024
Fruit - 1.94 (0.93–4.08)
p = 0.079
- 2.34 (0.85–6.28)
p = 0.097
- 2.66 (1.27–5.60)
p = 0.010
EDNP food - 2.47 (1.12–5.260)
p = 0.025
- - - 1.93 (0.92–4.06)
p = 0.083
SSB - - - - 2.05 (0.01–4.63)
p = 0.084
Alcohol - - - - 4.59 (1.53–43.7)
p = 0.006
-

1 Perception questions were undertaken at the completion of the intervention where those who agreed compared with those who disagreed (Reference group): Vegetables: Made me think about how much vegetables I eat. Fruit: Made me think about how much fruit I eat. EDNP foods: Made me think about how much junk food I eat. SSB: Made me think about how much soft drink and sugary drinks I have. Alcohol: Made me think about how much alcohol I drink.