Table 4.
Name | Year | Region | Ethnicity | Design | Genotype | Case | Control | MAF | HWE | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||
Method | GG | CG | CC | All | GG | CG | CC | All | |||||||
Bigler | 2005 | USA | Caucasian | PB | Taqman | 440 | 237 | 36 | 713 | 353 | 226 | 37 | 616 | 0.24 | 0.917 |
Huang | 2006 | USA | Caucasian | PB | Sequencing | 407 | 243 | 29 | 679 | 403 | 265 | 29 | 697 | 0.23 | 0.073 |
Pardini | 2008 | Czech | Caucasian | HB | PCR-RFLP | 334 | 177 | 21 | 532 | 356 | 153 | 23 | 532 | 0.19 | 0.211 |
Joshi | 2009 | USA | Caucasian | FB | Taqman | 183 | 114 | 11 | 308 | 213 | 137 | 11 | 361 | 0.22 | 0.046 |
Canbay | 2011 | Turkey | Caucasian | PB | PCR-RFLP | 43 | 34 | 2 | 79 | 148 | 83 | 16 | 247 | 0.23 | 0.352 |
Gil | 2012 | Poland | Caucasian | PB | PCR-RFLP | 86 | 35 | 11 | 132 | 64 | 31 | 5 | 100 | 0.21 | 0.625 |
Liu | 2012 | China | Asian | HB | PCR-RFLP | 233 | 603 | 192 | 1028 | 329 | 537 | 219 | 1085 | 0.45 | 0.996 |
Du | 2014 | China | Asian | HB | TaqMan | 286 | 459 | 133 | 878 | 355 | 405 | 124 | 884 | 0.37 | 0.623 |
Steck | 2014 | USA | Caucasian | PB | MassARRAY | 183 | 100 | 15 | 298 | 335 | 170 | 27 | 532 | 0.21 | 0.372 |
Steck | 2014 | USA | African | PB | MassARRAY | 65 | 120 | 39 | 224 | 100 | 151 | 66 | 317 | 0.45 | 0.519 |
Paszkowska-Szczur | 2015 | Poland | Caucasian | HB | Taqman | 429 | 272 | 32 | 733 | 869 | 404 | 85 | 1358 | 0.21 | 0.0001 |
Sun | 2015 | China | Asian | HB | PCR-RFLP | 216 | 476 | 198 | 890 | 227 | 497 | 186 | 910 | 0.48 | 0.004 |
Kabzinski | 2015 | Poland | Caucasian | HB | QPCR | 36 | 171 | 27 | 234 | 43 | 175 | 20 | 238 | 0.45 | < 0.001 |
Su | Current | China | Asian | HB | Taqman | 248 | 510 | 261 | 1019 | 265 | 515 | 256 | 1036 | 0.50 | 0.854 |
MAF, minor allele frequency; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; PB, population based; HB, hospital based; FB, family based; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.