Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 15;11(2):1020–1029.

Table 4.

Main characteristics of included studies for the final meta-analysis

Name Year Region Ethnicity Design Genotype Case Control MAF HWE

Method GG CG CC All GG CG CC All
Bigler 2005 USA Caucasian PB Taqman 440 237 36 713 353 226 37 616 0.24 0.917
Huang 2006 USA Caucasian PB Sequencing 407 243 29 679 403 265 29 697 0.23 0.073
Pardini 2008 Czech Caucasian HB PCR-RFLP 334 177 21 532 356 153 23 532 0.19 0.211
Joshi 2009 USA Caucasian FB Taqman 183 114 11 308 213 137 11 361 0.22 0.046
Canbay 2011 Turkey Caucasian PB PCR-RFLP 43 34 2 79 148 83 16 247 0.23 0.352
Gil 2012 Poland Caucasian PB PCR-RFLP 86 35 11 132 64 31 5 100 0.21 0.625
Liu 2012 China Asian HB PCR-RFLP 233 603 192 1028 329 537 219 1085 0.45 0.996
Du 2014 China Asian HB TaqMan 286 459 133 878 355 405 124 884 0.37 0.623
Steck 2014 USA Caucasian PB MassARRAY 183 100 15 298 335 170 27 532 0.21 0.372
Steck 2014 USA African PB MassARRAY 65 120 39 224 100 151 66 317 0.45 0.519
Paszkowska-Szczur 2015 Poland Caucasian HB Taqman 429 272 32 733 869 404 85 1358 0.21 0.0001
Sun 2015 China Asian HB PCR-RFLP 216 476 198 890 227 497 186 910 0.48 0.004
Kabzinski 2015 Poland Caucasian HB QPCR 36 171 27 234 43 175 20 238 0.45 < 0.001
Su Current China Asian HB Taqman 248 510 261 1019 265 515 256 1036 0.50 0.854

MAF, minor allele frequency; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; PB, population based; HB, hospital based; FB, family based; PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism.