Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):741–748. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.111

Table 3.

Follow-up Air Quality Measurements by Group

Measure Control Group
(n=42)
Air Cleaner Group
(n=35)
Air Cleaner Plus Health Coach Group
(n=38)
P Value
PM2.5 level, μg/m3
 Mean(SD) (n = 96) 38.9 (25.0) 17.9 (15.2) 32.2 (30.1) graphic file with name nihms-1015613-t0006.jpg .003
 Differencea (n = 86) 3.5 (20.0) −19.9 (28.2) −16.1 (38.2)
PM2.5–10 level, μg/m3
 Mean(SD) (n = 92) 18.0 (15.8) 11.0 (7.4) 13.5 (10.1) graphic file with name nihms-1015613-t0007.jpg .02
 Differencea (n = 78) 2.4 (20.8) −8.7 (17.4) −10.6 (14.7)
Air nicotine concentration, μg/m3
 Mean(SD) (n = 103) 1.4 (2.04) 0.9 (1.7) 0.9 (1.1) graphic file with name nihms-1015613-t0008.jpg .94
 Differencea (n = 93) −0.4 (2.31) −0.3 (1.9) −0.6 (1.8)
Urine cotinine concentration, ng/mL
 Mean(SD)(n = 115) 24.3 (27.4) 18.8 (24.1) 22.0 (28.9) graphic file with name nihms-1015613-t0009.jpg .85
 Differencea (n = 110) −2.0 (26.6) −2.4 (35.4) −1.4 (25.6)

Abbreviations: PM2.5, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 μm; PM2.5–10, particulate matter with a difference between particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 and 2.5 μm.

a

Indicates mean 6-month concentration minus the baseline concentration. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare differences among the 3 groups.