Table 2.

Linear regression analysis of square root (ΔCBV%) along with time in mice.

Region		NTL	NTL noscapine	arcAβ	arcAβ noscapine
Motor cortex	Slope	0.061 ± 0.002	0.066 ± 0.002	0.048 ± 0.001∗∗∗	0.057 ± 0.001##
	Intercept	2.178 ± 0.056	1.747 ± 0.047	1.4 ± 0.023	2.379 ± 0.037
	R	0.9243	0.9523	0.9773	0.9614
Sensory cortex	Slope	0.064 ± 0.003	0.069 ± 0.004	0.038 ± 0.002∗∗∗	0.054 ± 0.003###
	Intercept	3.120 ± 0.087	3.383 ± 0.096	3.164 ± 0.058	2.989 ± 0.082
	R	0.8462	0.8399	0.8172	0.8162
Hippocampus	Slope	0.045 ± 0.002	0.047 ± 0.002	0.050 ± 0.002	0.050 ± 0.002
	Intercept	2.451 ± 0.047	2.127 ± 0.055	2.503 ± 0.048	2.959 ± 0.066
	R	0.9036	0.8816	0.917	0.8556
Thalamus	Slope	0.042 ± 0.002	0.078 ± 0.003	0.049 ± 0.002	0.058 ± 0.002#
	Intercept	2.549 ± 0.063	2.669 ± 0.090	2.690 ± 0.044	2.731 ± 0.062
	R	0.8179	0.8829	0.9258	0.8999
Caudate nucleus	Slope	0.054 ± 0.001	0.065 ± 0.001	0.059 ± 0.002	0.053 ± 0.002
	Intercept	1.826 ± 0.032	1.327 ± 0.034	1.376 ± 0.043	1.848 ± 0.045
	R	0.9666	0.9744	0.9515	0.9334
Cerebellum	Slope	0.035 ± 0.003	0.045 ± 0.003	0.035 ± 0.001	0.037 ± 0.002
	Intercept	3.342 ± 0.075	2.946 ± 0.075	2.619 ± 0.033	2.429 ± 0.050
	R	0.6884	0.7877	0.9198	0.8486

Data is shown as mean ± standard error of the mean; ^∗∗∗p < 0.001 NTL vs. arcAβ, ^#p < 0.05, ^##p < 0.01, and ^###p < 0.001 arcAβ vs. arcA β-noscapine, two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc analysis; NTL (n = 8), NTL noscapine (n = 9), arcAβ (n = 9), arcAβ noscapine (n = 11).