Table 6. Unadjusted and adjusted binary logistic regression: Association between dietary patterns and SGA compared to AGA and LGA compared to AGA.
| Model | Dietary pattern | P | β | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGA | Unadjusted | Western | .142 | 1.38 | .90, 2.13 |
| Health Conscious | .002 | .45 | .27, .75 | ||
| Adjusted* | Western | .850 | 1.06 | .61, 1.84 | |
| Health Conscious | .046 | .51 | .26, .99 | ||
| LGA | Unadjusted | Western | .780 | .96 | .69, 1.32 |
| Health Conscious | .099 | 1.33 | .95, 1.86 | ||
| Adjusted* | Western | .849 | 1.04 | .72, 1.50 | |
| Health Conscious | .228 | 1.29 | .85, 1.94 |
* Maternal age, smoking during pregnancy, alcohol during pregnancy, exercise, GDM, conception & WIMD score.