Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hypertens. 2009 Jun 4;22(8):911–917. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.100

Table 3 |.

Pooled estimates

No. of
studies
Pooled
estimate
95% CI P for test of
homogeneity
τ2a P for
Begg’s Test
P for
Egger’s test
Relative risk comparing proportion of blacks and whites (referent) reaching BP target of DBP <90 or a decline of >10 mm Hg 4 1.0 (0.9, 1.0) 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.5
White–black differences in SBP (mm Hg)
 Excluding Wright, Krakoff 4 −2.7 −4.0, −1.3) >0.99 0.0 0.2   0.03
 Including Wright, Krakoff 6 −0.8 (−3.3, 1.8) <0.001 7.8 0.9 0.1
White–black differences in DBP (mm Hg)
 Excluding Wright, Krakoff 6 −0.4 (−1.0, 0.28) 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.7
 Including Wright, Krakoff 8 0.2 (−0.8, 1.1) 0.001 1.0 0.6 0.1
White SBP (mm Hg)
 Excluding Wright, Krakoff 4 13.1 (10.2, 15.9) <0.001 6.6 0.5 0.1
 Including Wright, Krakoff 6 12.7 (8.9, 16.6) <0.001 22.2 0.9 0.5
White DBP (mm Hg)
 Excluding Wright, Krakoff 6 12.5 (11.6, 13.4) 0.006 0.8 0.3 0.8
 Including Wright, Krakoff 8 11.8 (8.8, 14.8) <0.001 18.4 0.8 0.2
Black SBP (mm Hg)
 Excluding Wright, Krakoff 4 16.1 (13.8, 18.4) 0.02 3.3 >0.99 0.5
 Including Wright, Krakoff 6 14.6 (8.6, 20.7) <0.001 54.5 0.9 0.2
Black DBP (mm Hg)
 Excluding Wright, Krakoff 6 13.2 (12.2, 14.2) 0.02 0.9 0.e 0.8
 Including Wright, Krakoff 8 12.0 (8.0, 16.0) <0.001 32.4 0.1 0.1
a

Among-study variance.