Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 21;6(3):575–585. doi: 10.1002/acn3.733

Table 3.

Examination of sex differences in imaging target in the context of former treatment time windows and NIHSS criteria

Selection scenario Within window OR P‐values Beyond window OR P‐values n
Men (% targets) Women (% targets) Sex OR (W/M) Men (% targets) Women (% targets) Sex OR (W/M)
iv TPA (0–4.5 h window)
Perfusion target 150/195 (76.9%) 223/267 (83.5%) 1.52 0.08 135/200 (67.5%) 162/220 (73.6%) 1.34 0.168 882
Any arterial target 115/228 (50.4%) 195/310 (62.9%) 1.67 0.00 95/214 (44.4%) 141/259 (54.4%) 1.50 0.03 1,011
TPA OCCLUSION 76/228 (33.3%) 132/310 (42.6%) 1.48 0.03 135/200 (67.5%) 162/220 (73.6%) 1.34 0.168 1,011
EVT OCCLUSION 51/228 (22.4%) 103/310 (33.2%) 1.73 0.01 41/214 (19.2%) 54/259 (20.8%) 1.11 0.648 1,011
Perfusion‐diffusion mismatch 101/195 (51.8%) 160/267 (59.9%) 1.39 0.08 76/200 (38.0%) 96/219 (43.8%) 1.27 0.226 881
Guideline EVT (0–6 h window); limited to ICA and M1 occlusions & NIHSS ≥6
Perfusion target 42/42 (100%) 86/92 (93.5%) 0.00 0.09 21/28 (75.0%) 30/34 (88.2%) 2.50 0.178 196
Perfusion‐diffusion mismatch 36/42 (85.7%) 73/92 (79.4%) 0.64 0.38 19/28 (67.9%) 23/34 (67.7%) 0.99 0.986 196
Extended window EVT (6–24 h window); limited to ICA and M1 occlusions & NIHSS ≥10
Perfusion‐diffusion mismatch 32/38 (84.2%) 59/72 (81.9%) 0.85 0.77 16/20 (80.0%) 18/26 (69.2%) 0.56 0.415 156