Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 18;6(3):456–465. doi: 10.1002/acn3.716

Table 1.

APOE variants and the 31 SNPs and, their closest genes, log hazard ratio estimates used for PHS construction in Desikan et al.10 and their odds ratio estimates as in Lambert et al.6

SNP Chr Position Gene Β = log(HR) Desikan et al. (2017) −log10(P‐value) Desikan et al. (2017) B = log(OR) in IGAP B = log(OR) IGAP_ noGERAD A1 IGAP_ noGERAD
APOE ε2 19 APOE −0.47 >15.0 −0.66 1 −0.492 ε2
APOE ε4 19 APOE 1.03 >20.0 1.12 2 0.662 ε4
rs4266886 1 207685786 CR1 −0.09 2.7 −0.1542 0.1520 T
rs61822977 1 207796065 CR1 −0.08 2.8 −0.0805 −0.0820 A
rs6733839 2 127892810 BIN1 −0.15 10.5 −0.1880 0.1807 T
rs10202748 2 234003117 INPP5D −0.06 2.1 −0.058 −0.0603 A
rs115124923 6 32510482 HLA‐DRB5 0.17 7.4 0.1216 −0.0973 A
rs115675626 6 32669833 HLA‐DQB1 −0.11 3.2 −0.1246 0.1040 A
rs1109581 6 47678182 GPR115 −0.07 2.6 −0.0651 0.0601 T
rs17265593 7 37619922 BC043356 −0.23 3.6 −0.0659 −0.0620 T
rs2597283 7 37690507 BC043356 0.28 4.7 0.0679 0.0629 A
rs1476679 7 100004446 ZCWPW1 0.11 4.9 0.1741 0.0712 T
rs78571833 7 143122924 AL833583 0.14 3.8 0.0795 0.2083 A
rs12679874 8 27230819 PTK2B −0.09 4.2 −0.0795 −0.0748 A
rs2741342 8 27330096 CHRNA2 0.09 2.9 0.0916 −0.0872 T
rs7831810 8 27430506 CLU 0.09 3.0 0.083 −0.0774 A
rs1532277 8 27466181 CLU 0.21 8.3 0.1385 −0.1271 T
rs9331888 8 27468862 CLU 0.16 5.1 0.0819 −0.0806 C
rs7920721 10 11720308 CR595071 −0.07 2.9 −0.0713 −0.0660 A
rs3740688 11 47380340 SPI1 0.07 2.8 0.0724 0.0739 T
rs7116190 11 59964992 MS4A6A 0.08 3.9 0.0991 −0.0968 A
rs526904 11 85811364 PICALM −0.20 2.3 −0.1188 −0.1130 T
rs543293 11 85820077 PICALM 0.30 4.2 0.1257 −0.1192 A
rs11218343 11 121435587 SORL1 0.18 2.8 0.2697 0.2539 T
rs6572869 14 53353454 FERMT2 −0.11 3.0 −0.0947 0.1006 A
rs12590273 14 92934120 SLC24A4 0.10 3.5 0.1348 0.1231 T
rs7145100 14 107160690 abParts 0.08 2.0 0.1047 −0.1081 C
rs74615166 15 64725490 TRIP4 −0.23 3.1 −0.3358 −0.2986 T
rs2526378 17 56404349 BZRAP1 0.09 4.9 0.0762 0.0754 A
rs117481827 19 1021627 C19orf6 −0.09 2.5 −0.1288 −0.1059 T
rs7408475 19 1050130 ABCA7 0.18 4.3 0.0971 −0.0973 C
rs3752246 19 1056492 ABCA7 −0.25 8.4 −0.1345 −0.1308 C
rs7274581 20 55018260 CASS4 0.10 2.1 0.139 0.1497 A

First 6th columns are the same as they were presented in Desikan et al. (2017),10 followed by effect sizes from IGAP and IGAP_noGERAD summary statistics and reference allele as it was presented in IGAP.

1

B estimated on GERAD data when running LR.

2

B estimated on GERAD data when running Cox regression.