Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;9:4267. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38498-7

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Correlation between InterPep global score and prediction quality measured as Matthew’s Correlation Coefficient between the local score and native contacts, for different ways of combining the cluster score and highest local score. The weight for the local score is k and cluster score 1 − k. Optimal weight is found at k = 0.39. (b) Distribution of precision of predictions for different InterPep score cutoff values.