Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;9:4239. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40802-4

Table 1.

In the left part of the table the frequency (in percent) of diagnoses in the patient group is reported.

Diagnoses in the patients group High versus low to moderate disgust sensitivity
ICD-10 diagnoses Frequency of Diagnoses in Patients % (n) Frequency of high disgust within Diagnosis groups % Regression analysis
p Odds ratio (95% CI) β
Psychoactive substance use (F10–19) 11.5% (53) 15.1% 0.842 1.098
(0.438 to 2.754)
0.094
Mood disorders (F30–39) 57.4% (264) 12.5% 0.020 0.433
(0.214 to 0.877)
−0.837
Anxiety disorders (F40–41) 40.2% (185) 15.7% 0.662 1.158
(0.599 to 2.240)
0.147
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (F42) 9.1% (42) 21.4% 0.504 1.369
(0.545 to 3.436)
0.314
Post-traumatic stress disorder (F43.1) 24.1% (111) 26.4% <0.001 4.733
(2.376 to 9.429)
1.555
Dissociative disorders (F44) 3.5% (16) 20.0% 0.987 1.012
(0.237 to 4.324)
0.012
Somatoform disorders (F45) 21.7% (100) 15.0% 0.719 1.139
(0.560 to 2.318)
0.130
Eating disorders (F50) 14.1% (67) 23.9% 0.005 2.776
(1.353 to 5.697)
1.021

The right part of the table contains the frequency (in percent) of high disgust (defined as disgust ≥2.85, compare Fig. 4) within diagnosis groups and results of the logistic regression analysis with the disgust categories ‘high’/’low to moderate’ as dependent variable and diagnoses as independent variables.