. 2019 Mar 12;9:4262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40200-w

Table 2.

High frequency (HF) band of HRV.

Conditions	Mean (SD) of HF in ms²	p-value of post-hoc comparison (* denotes significant)
Religious chanting	0.00182 (0.00130)	compared to no chanting*, p = 0.014
No chanting	0.00432 (0.00421)	compared to non-religious chanting, p = 0.435
Non-religious chanting	0.00323(0.00316)	compared to religious chanting, p = 0.152

The table shows descriptive statistics and significance values for within-group comparisons, for the high frequency power of the heart rate variability derived from the ECG data. Repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect across conditions, F(2,42) = 5.90, p = 0.006.