Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;9:4224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39730-0

Table 2.

Contingency tables showing the distribution of resistance to selected antibiotics according to the site of isolation.

TZP resistance Blood Pus swab Stool Urine Total
N (%col) N (%col) N (%col) N (%col) N (%col)
R 10
(66.7%)
6
(60%)
52
(73.2%)
34
(35.1%)
102
(52.9%)
I 2
(13.3%)
3
(30%)
9
(12.7%)
38
(39.2%)
52
(26.9%)
S 3
(20%)
1
(10%)
10
(14.1%)
25
(25.8%)
39
(20.2%)
Total 15
(100%)
10
(100%)
71
(100%)
97
(100%)
193*
(100%)
Chi-square = 27.17 with 6 df; p = 0.0001
CAZ resistance Blood Pus swab Stool Urine Total
N (%col) N (%col) N (%col) N (%col) N (%col)
R 15
(100%)
10
(100%)
63
(88.7%)
60
(61.9%)
148
(76.7%)
I 0
(0%)
0
(0%)
2
(2.82%)
13
(13.4%)
15
(7.77%)
S 0
(0%)
0
(0%)
6
(8.45%)
24
(24.7%)
30
(15.5%)
Total 15
(100%)
10
(100%)
71
(100%)
97
(100%)
193*
(100%)
Chi-square = 25.50 with 6 df; p = 0.0003

Distribution of piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) and ceftazidime (CAZ) resistance phenotypes according to site of isolation. Phenotype-phenotype associations are tested by Chi-square test for independence. %col = percentage of column total.

*The total N = 193 after exclusion of tissues from which two or fewer samples were isolated.