Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;9:4224. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39730-0

Table 3.

Contingency tables linking some resistance phenotypes (to ATM, CTX and CAZ) to blaCTX-M PCR results (for blaCTX-M-1 and blaCTX-M-15).

blaCTX-M PCR Both negative Either positive Both positive Total
ATM resistance N (%row) Either positive N (%row)
R 3 (2.91%) 41 (39.8%) 59 (57.3%) 103 (100%)
I 4 (19.0%) 15 (71.4%) 2 (9.52%) 21 (100%)
S 25 (33.8%) 46 (62.2%) 3 (4.05%) 74 (100%)
Total 32 (16.2%) 102 (51.5%) 64 (32.3%) 198 (100%)
bla CTX-M PCR Both negative Either positive Both positive Total
CTX resistance N (%row) N (%row) N (%row)
R 7 (4.93%) 74 (52.1%) 61 (43.0%) 142 (100%)
I 7 (30.4%) 13 (56.5%) 3 (13.0%) 23 (100%)
S 18 (54.5%) 15 (45.5%) 0 (0%) 33 (100%)
Total 32 (16.2%) 102 (51.5%) 64 (32.3%) 198 (100%)
bla CTX-M PCR Both negative Either positive Both positive Total
CAZ resistance N (%row) N (%row) N (%row)
R 8 (5.23%) 85 (55.6%) 60 (39.2%) 153 (100%)
I 1 (6.67%) 10 (66.7%) 4 (26.7%) 15 (100%)
S 23 (76.7%) 7 (23.3%) 0 (0%) 30 (100%)
Total 32 (16.2%) 102 (51.5%) 64 (32.3%) 198 (100%)
Chi-square for ATM resistance vs. PCR results = 73.02 with 4 df; p ≤ 0.0001
Chi-square for CTX resistance vs. PCR results = 62.70 with 4 df; p ≤ 0.0001
Chi-square for CAZ resistance vs. PCR results = 97.98 with 4 df; p ≤ 0.0001

Phenotype-genotype associations are tested by Chi-square test for independence. % row = percentage of row total.