Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;10:1177. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09058-4

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Resistance enhancement involves RecA, SOS induction, and UmuDC. a OFL persisters derived from ΔrecA (n = 3), which is defective in SOS induction and recombinatorial repair, do not give rise to a population with increased RIF resistance. Complementation of ΔrecA restores the enhancement of RIF-resistant mutants from OFL persisters (n = 6), whereas persisters from ΔrecA mutants bearing the pBAD33 control do not give rise to a population with enhanced RIF resistance (n = 8). b Increase in RIF-resistant mutants was not observed in OFL persisters derived from lexA3 mutants (n = 4), which cannot induce SOS. c Upon deleting umuDC, which encodes error-prone, SOS-induced DNA polymerase V, a significant increase in RIF-resistant mutants in OFL persister-derived populations was observed (n = 5), but the magnitude of that increase was significantly lower than that of wild-type (n = 13). Mutants lacking error-prone polymerase II (ΔpolB, n = 6) or error-prone polymerase IV (ΔdinB, n = 6) had significant increases in RIF-resistant mutants in OFL persister-derived populations that were of a comparable magnitude as wild-type. d Complementation of UmuDC on pBAD33 in ΔumuDC mutants restores increase in RIF-resistant colonies from OFL persisters (n = 7), whereas the presence of pBAD33 control fails to restore the phenotype (n = 9). Error bars portray S.E.M. * indicates significance (p ≤ 0.05) between log-transformed fold-changes and log-transformed value of 1 (fold-change of 1 would indicate no difference in resistant mutants). # indicates significance (p ≤ 0.05, using two-tailed t-tests with unequal variances) between log-transformed fold-changes and those of wild-type. Zero values for ΔrecA+pBAD33 were not included in the statistical analysis because they could not be log-transformed