Table 3.
Fixed effects in model | LL | DIC | pD | ∆ DIC | Log-score | RMSE | Proportion of marginal variance explained by spatial effect ϕ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mean | s.d. | |||||||
bt ~ buffalos + nsheep + esheep | −103.74 | 198.54 | 45.49 | 0.00 | 1.63 | 0.656 | 0.78 | 0.18 |
bt ~ irrig. crop + buffalos + nsheep + esheep | −107.65 | 198.65 | 45.63 | 0.11 | 1.64 | 0.655 | 0.74 | 0.19 |
bt ~ irrig. crop + rain crop + buffalos + nsheep + esheep | −111.99 | 198.87 | 45.95 | 0.33 | 1.65 | 0.650 | 0.73 | 0.19 |
bt ~ rain crop + buffalos + nsheep + esheep | −108.35 | 198.93 | 45.97 | 0.39 | 1.65 | 0.647 | 0.75 | 0.18 |
bt ~ irrig. crop + rain crop + buffalos + esheep | −108.38 | 199.22 | 45.41 | 0.68 | 1.63 | 0.664 | 0.77 | 0.17 |
bt ~ rain crop + buffalos + esheep | −105.33 | 199.94 | 45.72 | 1.40 | 1.64 | 0.658 | 0.79 | 0.16 |
bt ~ irrig. crop + rain crop + nsheep + esheep | −108.97 | 200.28 | 46.47 | 1.74 | 1.67 | 0.653 | 0.68 | 0.20 |
bt ~ irrig. crop + rain crop + buffalos + nsheep | −109.06 | 200.32 | 46.20 | 1.78 | 1.65 | 0.657 | 0.77 | 0.17 |
bt ~ irrig. crop + rain crop + buffalos | −105.19 | 200.37 | 45.64 | 1.83 | 1.64 | 0.669 | 0.79 | 0.15 |
* bt ~ 1 | −103.81 | 210.52 | 49.11 | 11.98 | 1.70 | 0.625 | 0.87 | 0.11 |
The null intercept-only model* without any covariates is given at the bottom for comparison.